F wave analysis based on the compound muscle action potential scan
- PMID: 38963007
- PMCID: PMC11324398
- DOI: 10.1002/mus.28197
F wave analysis based on the compound muscle action potential scan
Abstract
Introduction/aims: Conventional F wave analysis involves a relatively uniform physiological environment induced by supramaximal stimulations. The F wave characteristics in a dynamic physiological condition, however, are rarely investigated. This study aimed to improve understanding of F wave properties in the more dynamic process by introducing a novel method to analyze F waves based on the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scan technique.
Methods: Twenty four healthy subjects participated in the study. The CMAP scan was applied to record muscle responses in the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles, respectively. F wave characteristics including mean F wave amplitude and latency (F-M latency), persistence and activating threshold were quantified.
Results: An average of 200 F waves per muscle were obtained from the CMAP scan recording. Weak to moderate correlations between F wave amplitude and stimulating intensity were observed in most of the APB (19 muscles; r = 0.33 ± 0.14, all p < .05) and ADM (23 muscles, r = 0.46 ± 0.16, all p < .05) muscles. Significantly longer mean F latency and lower activating F-threshold were found in the ADM muscles (F-M latency: APB: 25.43 ± 2.39 ms, ADM: 26.15 ± 2.32 ms, p < .05; F-threshold: APB: 7.68 ± 8.96% CMAP, ADM: 2.35 ± 2.42% CMAP, p < .05).
Discussion: This study introduces new features of F waves using the CMAP scan technique and identifies differences of F wave characteristics between the hand muscles. The CMAP scan based F waves analysis can be combined with the motor unit number estimation to assess functional alterations in motor neurons in neurological disorders.
Keywords: F wave analysis; compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scan; electrophysiology; hand muscles; motor neuron.
© 2024 The Author(s). Muscle & Nerve published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
F-waves responses derived from low-intensity electrical stimulation: A method to explore split-hand pathogenesis.Neurophysiol Clin. 2024 Nov;54(6):103018. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2024.103018. Epub 2024 Nov 2. Neurophysiol Clin. 2024. PMID: 39488863
-
Characterizing repeater F waves using the compound muscle action potential scan and machine learning techniques.Neurophysiol Clin. 2025 May 8;55(5):103076. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2025.103076. Online ahead of print. Neurophysiol Clin. 2025. PMID: 40345081
-
Cervical nerve root stimulation. Part I: technical aspects and normal data.Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Feb;117(2):392-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.10.011. Epub 2006 Jan 3. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006. PMID: 16403485
-
Estimating motor unit numbers from a CMAP scan: Repeatability study on three muscles at 15 centres.Clin Neurophysiol. 2023 Jul;151:92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.04.008. Epub 2023 May 8. Clin Neurophysiol. 2023. PMID: 37236129
-
Differences in Dysfunction of Thenar and Hypothenar Motoneurons in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Mar 7;10:99. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00099. eCollection 2016. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27014030 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kimura J F-wave determination in nerve conduction studies. Adv Neurol 1983;39:961–975. - PubMed
-
- Fisher MA, Zhu JQ, Uddin MK, Grindstaff P. Submaximal stimulation and f-wave parameters. J Clin Neurophysiol 2008;25(5):299–303. - PubMed
-
- Puksa L, Eeg-Olofsson KE, Stalberg E, Falck B. Reference values for F wave parameters in healthy 3–20 year old subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 2011;122(1):199–204. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources