Anesthetic Choice for Percutaneous Transcatheter Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage: A National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry Analysis
- PMID: 38963356
- PMCID: PMC11315250
- DOI: 10.4103/aca.aca_14_24
Anesthetic Choice for Percutaneous Transcatheter Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage: A National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry Analysis
Abstract
Context: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) was developed as a novel stroke prevention alternative for patients with atrial fibrillation, particularly for those not suitable for long-term oral anticoagulant therapy. Traditionally, general anesthesia (GA) has been more commonly used primarily due to the necessity of transesophageal echocardiography.
Aims: Compare trends of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) versus GA for percutaneous transcatheter LAAC with endocardial implant and assess for independent variables associated with primary anesthetic choice.
Settings and design: Multi-institutional data collected from across the United States using the National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry.
Material and methods: Retrospective data analysis from 2017-2021.
Statistical analysis used: Independent-sample t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests were used for continuous variables and Chi-square tests or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess patient and hospital characteristics.
Results: A total of 19,395 patients underwent the procedure, and 352 patients (1.8%) received MAC. MAC usage trended upward from 2017-2021 (P < 0.0001). MAC patients were more likely to have an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of≥ 4 (33.6% vs 22.89%) and to have been treated at centers in the South (67.7% vs 44.2%), in rural locations (71% vs 39.5%), and with lower median annual percutaneous transcatheter LAAC volume (102 vs 153 procedures) (all P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, patients treated in the West had 85% lower odds of receiving MAC compared to those in the Northeast (AOR: 0.15; 95% CI 0.03-0.80, P = 0.0261).
Conclusions: While GA is the most common anesthetic technique for percutaneous transcatheter closure of the left atrial appendage, a small, statistically significant increase in MAC occurred from 2017-2021. Anesthetic management for LAAC varies with geographic location.
Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy in Continued Access Left Atrial Appendage Closure Registries.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Dec 10;74(23):2878-2889. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.064. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 31806131 Clinical Trial.
-
Incidence and causes of in-hospital outcomes and 30-day readmissions after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: A US nationwide retrospective cohort study using claims data.Heart Rhythm. 2020 Mar;17(3):374-382. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.09.018. Epub 2019 Sep 17. Heart Rhythm. 2020. PMID: 31539630
-
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in patients with primary hemostasis disorders and atrial fibrillation.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 Aug;64(2):497-509. doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-01073-0. Epub 2021 Nov 25. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022. PMID: 34822043
-
Can intracardiac echocardiography completely replace transesophageal echocardiography to guide left atrial appendage closure?-The comparisons of intracardiac echocardiography with transesophageal echocardiography.J Card Surg. 2022 Sep;37(9):2766-2775. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16695. Epub 2022 Jun 21. J Card Surg. 2022. PMID: 35726669 Review.
-
The Emerging Role of Intracardiac Echocardiography (ICE) in Left Atrial Appendage Closure (LAAC).Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Oct;25(10):1223-1232. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01940-4. Epub 2023 Aug 23. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023. PMID: 37610598 Review.
References
-
- Furie KL, Goldstein LB, Albers GW, Khatri P, Neyens R, Turakhia MP, et al. Oral antithrombotic agents for the prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A science advisory for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2012;43:3442–53. - PubMed
-
- Gage BF, Waterman AD, Shannon W, Boechler M, Rich MW, Radford MJ. Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke. JAMA. 2001;285:2864. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.22.2864. - PubMed
-
- Kannel WB, Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Prevalence, incidence, prognosis, and predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation: Population-based estimates 11Reprints are not available. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:2N–9N. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00583-9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical