Nephrotic syndrome associated with solid malignancies: a systematic review

Abstract

Background: Nephrotic syndrome (NS) can occur as a paraneoplastic disorder in association with various types of carcinoma. However, paraneoplastic nephrotic syndrome (PNS) is often misdiagnosed as idiopathic nephrotic syndrome or as an adverse effect of oncology treatment, leading to delayed diagnosis and suboptimal treatment. The characteristics of NS associated with solid malignancies are not yet elucidated. We systematically summarized the clinical data for 128 cases of NS combined with solid malignancies with the aim of informing the clinical management of PNS.

Methods: We searched the PubMed database for articles published from the date of inception through to October 2023 using the following keywords: "cancer" or "malignant neoplasms" or "neoplasia" or "tumors" and "nephrotic syndrome", "nephrotic" or "syndrome, nephrotic". All data were extracted from case reports and case series, and the extraction included a method for identifying individual-level patient data.

Results: A literature search yielded 105 cases of PNS and 23 of NS induced by cancer therapy. The median age at diagnosis was 60 years, with a male to female ratio of 1.8:1. In patients with PNS, manifestations of NS occurred before, concomitantly with, or after diagnosis of the tumor (in 36%, 30%, and 34% of cases, respectively). Membranous nephropathy (49%) was the most prevalent renal pathology and found particularly in patients with lung, colorectal, or breast carcinoma. Regardless of whether treatment was for cancer alone or in combination with NS, the likelihood of remission was high.

Conclusion: The pathological type of NS may be associated with specific malignancies in patients with PNS. Prompt identification of PNS coupled with suitable therapeutic intervention has a significant impact on the outcome for patients.

Keywords: Malignancy; Nephrotic syndrome; Paraneoplastic nephrotic syndrome; Paraneoplastic syndrome; Solid malignancies.

Fig. 1

Flow chart showing the literature selection process

Fig. 2

Distribution of cases according to country and continent. (A) Percent distribution by country (%). (B) Percent distribution by continent