Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Jul;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e26261.
doi: 10.1002/jia2.26261.

Using FRAME to characterize provider-identified adaptations to a stepped care intervention for adolescents and youth living with HIV in Kenya: a mixed methods approach

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Using FRAME to characterize provider-identified adaptations to a stepped care intervention for adolescents and youth living with HIV in Kenya: a mixed methods approach

Nok Chhun et al. J Int AIDS Soc. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: The Data-informed Stepped Care (DiSC) study is a cluster-randomized trial implemented in 24 HIV care clinics in Kenya, aimed at improving retention in care for adolescents and youth living with HIV (AYLHIV). DiSC is a multi-component intervention that assigns AYLHIV to different intensity (steps) of services according to risk. We used the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded (FRAME) to characterize provider-identified adaptations to the implementation of DiSC to optimize uptake and delivery, and determine the influence on implementation outcomes.

Methods: Between May and December 2022, we conducted continuous quality improvement (CQI) meetings with providers to optimize DiSC implementation at 12 intervention sites. The meetings were guided by plan-do-study-act processes to identify challenges during early phase implementation and propose targeted adaptations. Meetings were audio-recorded and analysed using FRAME to categorize the level, context and content of planned adaptations and determine if adaptations were fidelity consistent. Providers completed surveys to quantify perceptions of DiSC acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility. Mixed effects linear regression models were used to evaluate these implementation outcomes over time.

Results: Providers participated in eight CQI meetings per facility over a 6-month period. A total of 65 adaptations were included in the analysis. The majority focused on optimizing the integration of DiSC within the clinic (83%, n = 54), and consisted of improving documentation, addressing scheduling challenges and improving clinic workflow. Primary reasons for adaptation were to align delivery with AYLHIV needs and preferences and to increase reach among AYLHIV: with reminder calls to AYLHIV, collaborating with schools to ensure AYLHIV attended clinic appointments and addressing transportation challenges. All adaptations to optimize DiSC implementation were fidelity-consistent. Provider perceptions of implementation were consistently high throughout the process, and on average, slightly improved each month for intervention acceptability (β = 0.011, 95% CI: 0.002, 0.020, p = 0.016), appropriateness (β = 0.012, 95% CI: 0.007, 0.027, p<0.001) and feasibility (β = 0.013, 95% CI: 0.004, 0.022, p = 0.005).

Conclusions: Provider-identified adaptations targeted improved integration into routine clinic practices and aimed to reduce barriers to service access unique to AYLHIV. Characterizing types of adaptations and adaptation rationale may enrich our understanding of the implementation context and improve abilities to tailor implementation strategies when scaling to new settings.

Keywords: FRAME; HIV; adaptation; adolescent and youth; continuous quality improvement; implementation science.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sankey Diagram for Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications Expanded. (A) WHAT was modified? (B) If context or content changes, modifications are made to which of the following? (C) At what LEVEL of delivery? (D) WHY? Goal of the adaptation. (E) LEVEL of rationale (reasons for making the adaptation). (F) FACTORS that influenced level of rationale. Adaptations may cover multiple categories, therefore, percentages may total more than 100%. Width of flow lines is related to percentage.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). Provider perceptions of acceptability during Stepped Care early implementation phase, including pre‐trial survey timepoint (April–December 2022).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). Provider perceptions of appropriateness during Stepped Care early implementation phase, including pre‐trial survey timepoint (April–December 2022).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). Provider perceptions of feasibility during Stepped Care early implementation phase, including pre‐trial survey timepoint (April–December 2022).

References

    1. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) . Fast‐track: Ending the AIDS Epidemic by 2030. 2014. Accessed on 02 June 2023. Available at https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2014/JC2686_WAD2014report
    1. The path that ends AIDS: UNAIDS Global AIDS Update 2023. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; 2023.
    1. Brown LB, Ayieko J, Mwangwa F, Owaraganise A, Kwarisiima D, Jain V, et al. Predictors of retention in HIV care among youth (15–24) in a universal test‐and‐treat setting in rural Kenya. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;76(1):e15–e18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petersen M, Balzer L, Kwarsiima D, Sang N, Chamie G, Ayieko J, et al. Association of implementation of a universal testing and treatment intervention with HIV diagnosis, receipt of antiretroviral therapy, and viral suppression in East Africa. JAMA. 2017;317(21):2196–2206. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Casale M, Carlqvist A, Cluver L. Recent interventions to improve retention in HIV care and adherence to antiretroviral treatment among adolescents and youth: a systematic review. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2019;33(6):237–252. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types