Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 7:18:100328.
doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100328. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Database analysis comparing incidence and complication rates between inpatient and outpatient laminotomies for lumbar disc herniation

Kevin Y Heo  1 , Janice M Bonsu  1 , Sameer Khawaja  1 , Anthony Karzon  1 , Prashant V Rajan  1 , Lauren A Barber  1 , Sangwook Tim Yoon  1
Affiliations

Database analysis comparing incidence and complication rates between inpatient and outpatient laminotomies for lumbar disc herniation

Kevin Y Heo et al. N Am Spine Soc J. .

Abstract

Background: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common condition that can be characterized with disabling pain. While most patients recover without surgery, some still require operative intervention. The epidemiology and trends of laminotomy for LDH have not been recently studied, and current practice patterns might be different from historical norms. This study aimed to investigate the trends of inpatient and outpatient laminotomies for LDH and compare complication rates between these two sites of service.

Methods: A large, national database was utilized to identify patients > 8 years old who underwent a laminotomy for LDH between 2009 and 2019. Two cohorts were created based on site of surgery: inpatient versus outpatient. The outpatient cohort was defined as patients who had a length of stay less than 1 day without any associated hospitalization. Epidemiologic analyses for these cohorts were performed by demographics. Patients in both groups were then 1:1 propensity-score matched based on age, sex, insurance type, geographic region, and comorbidities. Ninety-day postoperative complications were compared between cohorts utilizing multivariate logistic regressions.

Results: The average incidence of laminotomy for LDH was 13.0 per 10,000 persons-years. Although the national trend in incidence had not changed from 2009 to 2019, the proportion of outpatient laminotomies significantly increased in this time period (p=.02). Outpatient laminotomies were more common among younger and healthier patients. Patients with inpatient laminotomies had significantly higher rates of surgical site infections (odds ratio [OR] 1.61, p<.001), venous thromboembolism (VTE) (OR 1.96, p<.001), hematoma (OR 1.71, p<.001), urinary tract infections (OR 1.41, p<.001), and acute kidney injuries (OR 1.75, p=.001), even when controlling for selected confounders.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated an increasing trend in the performance of laminotomy for LDH toward the outpatient setting. Even when controlling for certain confounders, patients requiring inpatient procedures had higher rates of postoperative complications. This study highlights the importance of carefully evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of performing these procedures in an outpatient versus inpatient setting.

Keywords: Epidemiology; Inpatient surgery; Laminotomy; Lumbar disc herniation; Lumbar spine surgery; Outpatient surgery; Postoperative complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

One or more of the authors declare financial or professional relationships on ICMJE-NASSJ disclosure forms.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig. 1
Annual incidence of laminotomy for lumbar disc herniation from 2009–2019, by Site of Care.
Fig 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of laminotomy for lumbar disc herniation by Site of Care.
Fig 3
Fig. 3
A. Incidence of laminotomy for lumbar disc herniation by sex- and age-strata; all sites.
Fig 3
Fig. 3
B. Incidence of laminotomy for lumbar disc herniation by sex- and age-strata; outpatient only.
Fig 3
Fig. 3
C. Incidence of laminotomy for lumbar disc herniation by sex- and age-strata; inpatient only.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Lee CH, Chung CK, Kim CH, Kwon JW. Health care burden of spinal diseases in the Republic of Korea: analysis of a Nationwide Database from 2012 through 2016. Neurospine. 2018;15(1):66–76. doi: 10.14245/ns.1836038.019. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lucas JW, Connor EM, Back Bose J. Lower limb, and upper limb pain among U.S. adults, 2019. NCHS Data Brief. 2021;(415):1–8. - PubMed
    1. Dydyk AM, Ngnitewe Massa R, Mesfin FB. Disc herniation. StatPearls. 2022 - PubMed
    1. Fjeld OR, Grovle L, Helgeland J, et al. Complications, reoperations, readmissions, and length of hospital stay in 34 639 surgical cases of lumbar disc herniation. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-B(4):470–477. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B4.BJJ-2018-1184.R1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Protzer LA, Glassman SD, Mummaneni PV, et al. Return to work in patients with lumbar disc herniation undergoing fusion. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02682-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources