Commentary: Vitamin D status and tic disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
- PMID: 38966490
- PMCID: PMC11222574
- DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1385212
Commentary: Vitamin D status and tic disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Keywords: meta-analytic thinking; scientific inference and reasoning; statistical inference abuse; tic disorders; vitamin D.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Comment on
-
Vitamin D status and tic disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Front Pediatr. 2023 May 30;11:1173741. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1173741. eCollection 2023. Front Pediatr. 2023. PMID: 37325365 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Gelman A, Stern H. The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. Am Stat. (2006) 60(4):328–31. 10.1198/000313006X152649 - DOI
-
- Wasserstein, Schirm AL, Lazar NA. Moving to a world beyond “p < 0.05.”. Am Stat. (2019) 73(sup1):1–19. 10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913 - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources