Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 1;110(11):7088-7096.
doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001924.

Unveiling the prognostic role of blood inflammatory indexes in a retrospective cohort of patients undergoing liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Affiliations

Unveiling the prognostic role of blood inflammatory indexes in a retrospective cohort of patients undergoing liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Flavio Milana et al. Int J Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Systemic inflammation is relevant in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), but controversial results exist on the prognostic role of inflammatory indexes and their correlation with tumor microenvironment. The authors aimed to explore the biological and prognostic values of these indexes.

Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study involving iCCA patients who underwent hepatic resection between 2010 and 2021 was conducted. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and clinic-pathological factors were recorded. Immune-cell subpopulations, isolated from surgical specimens, were analyzed by flow cytometry. NLR and LMR cut-offs were calculated by X-Tile software. Linear regression, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analyses were conducted.

Results: A total of 101 iCCA patients were considered. NLR ≥3.83 and LMR <2.28 correlated with worse survival. Patients were divided into groups: 67 (66.3%) in the low-risk and 34 (33.7%) in the high-risk (having at least one worse prognostic ratio). The 5-year overall survival was 49.8 and 18.9% for low- and high-risk groups, respectively ( P =0.003). An elevated CA19-9 in the high-risk group gives 2.148 HR (95% CI: 1.060-4.349) of mortality and 2.182 HR (95% CI: 1.206-3.948) of disease recurrence. Flow cytometry analysis of 20 surgical specimens highlighted that NLR was associated with tumor-derived NLR ( P =0.026) and LMR with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes ( P =0.002). In a subset of five high-risk vs five low-risk patients, T-cell evaluation showed a higher prevalence of CD4+ compared to CD8+ cells in the high-risk group (78.5 vs. 21.5%, P <0.0001). Conversely, low-risk patients demonstrated a noteworthy infiltration of CD8+ cells compared to the high-risk group (21.5 vs. 48.7%, P =0.037).

Conclusions: The combination of blood inflammatory indexes determined two survival-risk profiles. The correlation between the blood scores and the iCCA microenvironment suggests a link between immune-cell infiltration and the risk group. These findings open the possibility of patient stratification with the chance to identify subgroups suitable for dedicated follow-up and targeted immuno-chemotherapy protocols.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no financial conflict of interest with regard to the content of this report.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Survival of the analyzed cohort according to the risk score. A) Overall survival and disease-free survival comparisons between the high-risk and the low-risk score populations. B) Overall survival and disease-free survival comparisons between high-risk and CA19-9pos versus reference group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
T cell subpopulation analysis of iCCA high-risk and low-risk patients. A) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis and graphical representation of CD4+ and CD8+ cells in iCCA high-risk and low-risk patients. Scale bar 50 μm. B) Percentage of infiltrating T cell subpopulations in iCCA high-risk (n=5) and low-risk (n=5) patients. Two-way ANOVA (mean±SEM). *P<0.05; ****P<0.0001.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020;70:7–30. - PubMed
    1. European Association for the Study of the Liver . Electronic address: easloffice@easloffice.eu, European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL-ILCA Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 2023;79:181–208. - PubMed
    1. Moris D, Palta M, Kim C, et al. . Advances in the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: An overview of the current and future therapeutic landscape for clinicians. CA Cancer J Clin 2023;73:198–222. - PubMed
    1. Izquierdo-Sanchez L, Lamarca A, La Casta A, et al. . Cholangiocarcinoma landscape in Europe: Diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic insights from the ENSCCA Registry. J Hepatol 2022;76:1109–1121. - PubMed
    1. Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, et al. . The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:93–99. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources