Clinical and genetic risk factors for progressive fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease
- PMID: 38967582
- PMCID: PMC11227360
- DOI: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000487
Clinical and genetic risk factors for progressive fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease
Abstract
Background: Fibrosis-4 (FIB4) is a recommended noninvasive test to assess hepatic fibrosis among patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Here, we used FIB4 trajectory over time (ie, "slope" of FIB4) as a surrogate marker of liver fibrosis progression and examined if FIB4 slope is associated with clinical and genetic factors among individuals with clinically defined MASLD within the Million Veteran Program Cohort.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, FIB4 slopes were estimated through linear regression for participants with clinically defined MASLD and FIB4 <2.67 at baseline. FIB4 slope was correlated with demographic parameters and clinical outcomes using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models. FIB4 slope as a quantitative phenotype was used in a genome-wide association analysis in ancestry-specific analysis and multiancestry meta-analysis using METAL.
Results: FIB4 slopes, generated from 98,361 subjects with MASLD (16,045 African, 74,320 European, and 7996 Hispanic), showed significant associations with sex, ancestry, and cardiometabolic risk factors (p < 0.05). FIB4 slopes also correlated strongly with hepatic outcomes and were independently associated with time to cirrhosis. Five genetic loci showed genome-wide significant associations (p < 5 × 10-8) with FIB4 slope among European ancestry subjects, including 2 known (PNPLA3 and TM6SF2) and 3 novel loci (TERT 5.1 × 10-11; LINC01088, 3.9 × 10-8; and MRC1, 2.9 × 10-9).
Conclusions: Linear trajectories of FIB4 correlated significantly with time to progression to cirrhosis, with liver-related outcomes among individuals with MASLD and with known and novel genetic loci. FIB4 slope may be useful as a surrogate measure of fibrosis progression.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Conflict of interest statement
Julie A. Lynch received grants from Alnylam, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Biodesix, Celgene, Cerner Enviza, GlaxoSmithKline, IQVIA, Janssen, Kantar Health, Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Novartis, and Parexel. Scott L. DuVall received grants from Alnylam, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Biodesix, Celgene, Cerner Enviza, GlaxoSmithKline, IQVIA, Janssen, Kantar Health, Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Novartis, and Parexel. David E. Kaplan advises and received grants from AstraZeneca and Roche Genentech. He received grants from Bausch, Exact, and Glycotest. Tae-Hwi Scwahtes-An consults for Target RWE. Kyong-Mi Chang consults for GlaxoSmithKline. He advises Virion. The remaining authors have no conflicts to report.
Figures

















References
-
- Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease—Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64:73–84. - PubMed
-
- Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M, Pagano G. Meta-analysis: Natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for liver disease severity. Ann Med. 2011;43:617–649. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources