Instrumentless liver suspension for liver retraction in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy
- PMID: 38967769
- DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01928-x
Instrumentless liver suspension for liver retraction in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy
Abstract
The popularity of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) is increasing, yet it remains a complex procedure. Outcomes are influenced by various factors, including patient-specific variables, disease characteristics, and surgical technique. Numerous and intricate details contribute to the technical success of RPD. In this study, our focus is on achieving effective and "gentle" liver retraction. The use of liver retractors has been associated with the risk of retractor-related liver injury (RRLI), which can have serious consequences. Here, we introduce a refined technique for instrumentless liver retraction in RPD, developed progressively through a series of over 300 procedures. The core concept of this technique involves suspending the liver to the diaphragmatic dome. This is accomplished by securing the round ligament to the anterior abdominal wall using transparietal sutures and attaching the fundus of the gallbladder and the anterior margin of liver segment number 3 to the diaphragm. Our consecutive series of over 300 RPDs demonstrates the feasibility and safety of this approach, with no clinically relevant RRLI observed. Instrumentless liver retraction offers a valuable refinement in RPD, streamlining the procedure while reducing potential complications associated with dedicated retractors.
Keywords: Liver injury; Liver retraction; Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy; Postoperative complications; Retractor-related liver injury; Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.
© 2024. Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).
References
-
- Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Palmeri M, Miccoli M, Costa F, Vistoli F, Amorese G, Boggi U (2016) The learning curve in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg 33:299–307. https://doi.org/10.1159/000445015 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Vistoli F, Amorese G, Boggi U (2021) State of the art of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. Updates Surg 73:873–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01058-8 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chen H, Weng Y, Zhao S, Wang W, Ji Y, Peng C, Deng X, Shen B (2024) Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma after the learning curve: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Endosc 38:821–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10530-y - DOI - PubMed
-
- Boggi U, Donisi G, Napoli N et al (2023) Prospective minimally invasive pancreatic resections from the IGOMIPS registry: a snapshot of daily practice in Italy on 1191 between 2019 and 2022. Updates Surg 75:1439–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01592-7 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Law W, Percarpio R, Song Q, Smith KD, Hoffer EK, McNulty N (2023) CT characterization of retractor related liver injuries after pancreaticoduodenectomy: retrospective analysis of a single institution experience. Clin Imaging 99:53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.04.006 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources