Therapeutic challenges and unmet needs in the management of myasthenia gravis: an Italian expert opinion
- PMID: 38967883
- DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07577-7
Therapeutic challenges and unmet needs in the management of myasthenia gravis: an Italian expert opinion
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare, autoimmune, neurological disorder. Most MG patients have autoantibodies against acetylcholine receptors (AChRs). Some have autoantibodies against muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) or lipoprotein-receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4), and some are seronegative. Standard of care, which includes anti-cholinesterase drugs, thymectomy, corticosteroids (CS), and off-label use of non-steroidal immunosuppressive drugs (NSISTs), is bounded by potential side effects and limited efficacy in refractory generalized MG (gMG) patients. This highlights the need for new therapeutic approaches for MG. Eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits the complement system, has been recently approved in Italy for refractory gMG. A panel of 11 experts met to discuss unmet therapeutic needs in the acute and chronic phases of the disease, as well as the standard of care for refractory patients. Survival was emphasized as an acute phase outcome. In the chronic phase, persistent remission and early recognition of exacerbations to prevent myasthenic crisis and respiratory failure were considered crucial. Refractory patients require treatments with fast onset of action, improved tolerability, and the ability to slow disease progression and increase life expectancy. The Panel agreed that eculizumab would presumably meet the therapeutic needs of many refractory gMG patients. The panel concluded that the unmet needs of current standard of care treatments for gMG are significant. Evaluating new therapeutic options accurately is essential to find the best balance between efficacy and tolerability for each patient. Collecting real-world data on novel molecules in routine clinical practice is necessary to address unmet needs.
Keywords: AChR; Eculizumab; Generalized Myasthenia gravis; MuSK; Refractoriness.
© 2024. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- McGrogan A, Sneddon S, de Vries CS (2010) The incidence of myasthenia gravis: a systematic literature review. Neuroepidemiology 34:171–183. https://doi.org/10.1159/000279334 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Phillips LH (2003) The epidemiology of myasthenia gravis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 998:407–412. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1254.053 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bubuioc A-M, Kudebayeva A, Turuspekova S et al (2021) The epidemiology of myasthenia gravis. J Med Life 14:7–16. https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2020-0145 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Dresser L, Wlodarski R, Rezania K, Soliven B (2021) Myasthenia Gravis: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations. J Clin Med 10:2235. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112235 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Grob D (1953) Course and management of myasthenia gravis. J Am Med Assoc 153:529–532. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1953.02940230001001 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
