Gender Differences in the Path to Medical School Deanship
- PMID: 38967920
- PMCID: PMC11227086
- DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.20570
Gender Differences in the Path to Medical School Deanship
Erratum in
-
Error in Author Affiliations.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2431056. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.31056. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39102270 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Importance: Women account for only 28% of current US medical school deans. Studying the differences between women and men in their preparation to becoming deans might help to explain this discrepancy.
Objective: To identify differences in the leadership development experiences between women and men in their ascent to the medical school deanship.
Design, setting, and participants: In this qualitative study, volunteers from the roster of the Association of American Medical Colleges Council of Deans were solicited and interviewed from June 15 to November 9, 2023. Women deans were recruited first, then men who had been appointed to their deanships at a similar time to their women counterparts were recruited. Deans were interviewed on topics related to number of applications for deanships, prior leadership roles, leadership development, personal factors, and career trajectories. Interviews were coded, and themes were extracted through conventional content analysis.
Main outcome and measures: Career and leadership development experiences were elicited using a semistructured interview guide.
Results: We interviewed 17 women and 17 men deans, representing 25.8% (34 of 132) of the total population of US medical school deans. Most deans (23 [67.6%]) practiced a medicine-based specialty or subspecialty. No statistically significant differences were found between women and men with regard to years to attain deanship (mean [SD], 2.7 [3.4] vs 3.7 [3.7] years), years as a dean (mean [SD], 5.7 [5.2] vs 6.0 [5.0] years), highest salary during career (mean [SD], $525 769 [$199 936] vs $416 923 [$195 848]), or medical school rankings (mean [SD], 315.5 [394.5] vs 480.5 [448.9]). Their reports indicated substantive gender differences in their paths to becoming a dean. Compared with men, women deans reported having to work harder to advance, while receiving less support and opportunities for leadership positions by their own institutions. Subsequently, women sought leadership development from external programs. Women deans also experienced gender bias when working with search firms.
Conclusions and relevance: This qualitative study of US medical school deans found that compared with men, women needed to be more proactive, had to participate in external leadership development programs, and had to confront biases during the search process. For rising women leaders, this lack of support had consequences, such as burnout and attrition, potentially affecting the makeup of future generations of medical school deans. Institutional initiatives centering on leadership development of women is needed to mitigate the gender biases and barriers faced by aspiring women leaders.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
Creating Equitable Paths to Medical School Deanship.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2420576. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.20576. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38967931 No abstract available.
References
-
- Association of American Medical Colleges . U.S. medical school deans by dean type and gender. Accessed May 27, 2024. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/faculty-institutions/data/us-medical-s...
-
- Falcone CM, Earle P, Isaacson I, Schlosser J. Route to the top: deans at North America’s academic medical schools. Physician Exec. 2007;33(6):58-62. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources