Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul;132(7):77001.
doi: 10.1289/EHP14647. Epub 2024 Jul 5.

Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants and Plasticizers in Relation to Fetal Growth in the LIFECODES Fetal Growth Study

Affiliations

Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants and Plasticizers in Relation to Fetal Growth in the LIFECODES Fetal Growth Study

Paige A Bommarito et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Organophosphate esters (OPEs), used ubiquitously as flame retardants and plasticizers in consumer products, are suspected of having developmental toxicity.

Objectives: Our study aimed to estimate associations between prenatal exposure to OPEs and fetal growth, including both ultrasound (head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur length, and estimated fetal weight) and delivery [birth weight z-score, small-for-gestational age (SGA), and large-for-gestational age (LGA)] measures of growth.

Methods: In the LIFECODES Fetal Growth Study (2008-2018), an enriched case-cohort of 900 babies born at the small and large ends of the growth spectrum, we quantified OPE biomarkers in three urine samples per pregnant participant and abstracted ultrasound and delivery measures of fetal growth from medical records. We estimated associations between pregnancy-averaged log-transformed OPE biomarkers and repeated ultrasound measures of fetal growth using linear mixed-effects models, and delivery measures of fetal growth using linear (birth weight) and logistic (SGA and LGA) regression models.

Results: Most OPE biomarkers were positively associated with at least one ultrasound measure of fetal growth, but associations with delivery measures were largely null. For example, an interquartile range (IQR; 1.31 ng/mL) increase in bis(2-chloroethyl) phosphate concentration was associated with larger z-scores in head circumference [mean difference (difference): 0.09; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01, 0.17], abdominal circumference (difference: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.18), femur length (difference: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.19), and estimated fetal weight (difference: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.22) but not birth weight (difference: 0.04; 95% CI: -0.08, 0.17). At delivery, an IQR (1.00 ng/mL) increase in diphenyl phosphate (DPHP) concentration was associated with an SGA birth (odds ratio: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.94).

Conclusions: In a large prospective cohort, gestational OPE exposures were associated with larger fetal size during pregnancy, but associations at delivery were null. DPHP concentrations were associated with heightened risk of an SGA birth. These findings suggest that OPE exposure may affect fetal development. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14647.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1 is a flowchart with four steps. Step 1: The 3330 study participants in the LIFECODES pregnancy cohort led to 199 small-for-gestational age enrichment set participants, 504 random subcohort participants, and 198 large-for-gestational age enrichment set participants. Step 2: The 199 small-for-gestational age enrichment set led to 248 small-for-gestational age cases. Step 3: The random subcohort of 504 cases contributed to 248 small-for-gestational age cases, 412 appropriate-for-gestational age cases, and 241 large-for-gestational age cases. Step 4: The 198 large-for-gestational age enrichment set led to 241 large-for-gestational age cases.
Figure 1.
Study flow diagram for the LIFECODES Fetal Growth Study (2008–2018). Note: AGA, appropriate-for-gestational age; LGA, large-for-gestational age; SGA, small-for-gestational age.
Figure 2 is a set of four forest plots titled head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur length, and estimated fetal weight, plotting mean difference (95 percent confidence intervals) in these ultrasound measurements in association with diphenyl phosphate, di-n-butyl phosphate, bis(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate, bis(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate, and bis(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (y-axis), ranging from negative 0.1 to 0.2 in increments of 0.1 (x-axis).
Figure 2.
Adjusted mean z-score differences and 95% CIs for an IQR-increase in average urinary concentrations of OPE biomarkers and fetal during gestation in the LIFECODES Fetal Growth Study (2008–2018; n=900). Note: Corresponding numeric results can be found in supplemental Table 2. Mean z-score differences estimated by linear mixed-effects models adjusted for participant age, prepregnancy BMI, educational attainment, race and ethnicity, insurance status, year of conception, parity, alcohol and smoking during pregnancy, season of enrollment, and fetal sex assigned at birth. Models incorporate both inverse probability of sampling weights and weights according to number of ultrasounds received during pregnancy. IQRs of log-transformed continuous biomarkers were: BCEP [1.31log(ng/mL)], BCIPP [0.97log(ng/mL)], BDCIPP [1.32log(ng/mL)], DnBP [0.57log(ng/mL)], DPhP [1.00log(ng/mL)]. BCEP, bis(2-chloroethyl) phosphate; BCIPP, bis(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate; BDCIPP, bis(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; DnBP, di-n-butyl phosphate; DPHP, diphenyl phosphate; IQR, interquartile range; OPE, organophosphate esters.
Figure 3 is a set of three forest plots titled small-for-gestational age, large-for-gestational age, and birthweight z score, plotting diphenyl phosphate, di-n-butyl phosphate, bis(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate, bis(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate, and bis(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (y-axis) across odds ratio (95 percent confidence interval), for small-for-gestational age and large-for-gestational age ranging from 0.5 to 1.0 in increments of 0.5 and 1.0 to 2.0 in increments of 1.0; 0.5 to 1.0 in increments of 0.5 and 1.0 to 2.0 in increments of 1.0; and mean difference for birthweight z-scores (95 percent confidence interval), ranging from negative 0.2 to 0.2 in increments of 0.1 (x-axis).
Figure 3.
Adjusted point estimates and 95% CIs for an IQR-increase in average urinary concentrations of OPE biomarkers and size at delivery in the LIFECODES Fetal Growth Study (2008–2018; n=900). Note: Corresponding numeric results can be found in Supplemental Table 7. Point estimates estimated by linear and logistic regression models incorporated inverse probability weights of selection and were adjusted for participant age, prepregnancy BMI, educational attainment, race and ethnicity, insurance status, year of conception, parity, alcohol and smoking during pregnancy, season of enrollment, and fetal sex assigned at birth. n=247 SGA births, n=241 LGA births, and n=412 AGA controls. IQRs of log-transformed continuous biomarkers were: BCEP [1.31log(ng/mL)], BCIPP [0.97log(ng/mL)], BDCIPP [1.32log(ng/mL)], DnBP [0.57log(ng/mL)], DPhP [1.00log(ng/mL)]. AGA, appropriate-for-gestational age; BCEP, bis(2-chloroethyl) phosphate; BCIPP, bis(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate; BDCIPP, bis(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; DnBP, di-n-butyl phosphate; DPHP, diphenyl phosphate; IQR, interquartile range; LGA, large-for-gestational age; MD, mean difference; OPE, organophosphate esters; OR, odds ratio; SGA, small-for-gestational age.
Figure 4A is a ribbon plus line graph, plotting predicted estimated fetal weight z-score (95 percent confidence interval), ranging from negative 2 to 0 in unit increments (y-axis) across Gestational Age (weeks), ranging from 15 to 40 in increments of 5 (x-axis) for Trajectory Group, including 19 cases of Extremely Small with 8 percent, 144 cases of small with 59 percent, and 81 cases of Average−Declining with 33 percent. Figure 4B is a set of three forest plots titled extremely small, small, average-declining, plotting diphenyl phosphate, di-n-butyl phosphate, bis(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate, bis(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate, bis(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (y-axis) across odds ratio (95 percent confidence intervals), ranging from 0.3 to 1.0 in increments of 0.7 and 1.0 to 3.0 in increments of 2.0 (x-axis), respectively.
Figure 4.
(A) Predicted mean (95% CI) estimated fetal weights for SGA subtypes. (B) Adjusted ORs and 95% CIs for an IQR-increase in average urinary concentrations of OPE biomarkers and subtypes of SGA relative to AGA births in the LIFECODES Fetal Growth Study (2008–2018; n=659). Note: Corresponding numeric results can be found in Supplemental Table 13. Adjusted ORs estimated from logistic regression models adjusted for participant age, prepregnancy BMI, educational attainment, race and ethnicity, insurance status, year of conception, parity, alcohol and smoking during pregnancy, season of enrollment, and fetal sex assigned at birth. IQRs of log-transformed continuous biomarkers were: BCEP [1.31log(ng/mL)], BCIPP [0.97log(ng/mL)], BDCIPP [1.32log(ng/mL)], DnBP [0.57log(ng/mL)], DPhP [1.00log(ng/mL)]. SGA subtypes were determined among SGA births only, and the referent category for analysis was AGA births, for which the median (25th, 75th percentiles) observed EFW z-score at 20, 25, 30, and 35 wk of gestation was 0.60 (1.12, 0.02), 0.37 (0.74, 0.02), 0.08 (0.76, 0.42), 0.09 (0.64, 0.40). AGA, appropriate-for-gestational age; BCEP, bis(2-chloroethyl) phosphate; BCIPP, bis(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate; BDCIPP, bis(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; DnBP, di-n-butyl phosphate; DPHP, diphenyl phosphate; EFW, estimated fetal weight; IQR, interquartile range; OPE, organophosphate esters; OR, odds ratio; SGA, small-for-gestational age.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Liu R, Mabury SA. 2018. Unexpectedly high concentrations of a newly identified organophosphate ester, tris(2,4-di-tert-butylphenyl) phosphate, in indoor dust from Canada. Environ Sci Technol 52(17):9677–9683, PMID: 30074770, 10.1021/acs.est.8b03061. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blum A, Behl M, Birnbaum L, Diamond ML, Phillips A, Singla V, et al. . 2019. Organophosphate ester flame retardants: are they a regrettable substitution for polybrominated diphenyl ethers? Environ Sci Technol Lett 6(11):638–649, PMID: 32494578, 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00582. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoffman K, Butt CM, Webster TF, Preston EV, Hammel SC, Makey C, et al. . 2017. Temporal trends in exposure to organophosphate flame retardants in the United States. Environ Sci Technol Lett 4(3):112–118, PMID: 28317001, 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00475. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bommarito PA, Friedman A, Welch BM, Cantonwine DE, Ospina M, Calafat AM, et al. . 2023. Temporal trends and predictors of gestational exposure to organophosphate ester flame retardants and plasticizers. Environ Int 180:108194, PMID: 37708814, 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108194. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang J, Zhao Y, Li M, Du M, Li X, Li Y. 2019. A review of a class of emerging contaminants: the classification, distribution, intensity of consumption, synthesis routes, environmental effects and expectation of pollution abatement to organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs). Int J Mol Sci 20(12):2874, PMID: 31212857, 10.3390/ijms20122874. - DOI - PMC - PubMed