Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Jul 5;103(27):e38816.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038816.

Is it necessary to use a cervical brace after single- or double-level ACDF?

Affiliations
Observational Study

Is it necessary to use a cervical brace after single- or double-level ACDF?

Hong Kyung Shin et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Abstract

Although anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most frequently performed spinal surgeries, there is no consensus regarding the necessity of prescribing a cervical brace after surgery. This study aimed to investigate any difference in radiological and clinical outcomes when wearing or not wearing cervical braces after single- or double-level ACDF. We examined 2 cohorts of patients who underwent single- or double-level ACDF surgery with and without a cervical brace: patients who underwent ACDF between March 2018 and December 2019 received a cervical brace, while patients who underwent ACDF between January 2020 and May 2021 did not. Each patient was evaluated radiologically and functionally using plain X-ray, modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score, and visual analog scale for neck and arm until 12 months after surgery. Fusion rate, subsidence, and postoperative complications were also evaluated. Eighty-three patients were included in the analysis: 38 were braced and 45 were not. The demographic characteristics and baseline outcome measures of both groups were similar. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the clinical measures at baseline. The modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score and visual analog scale for neck and arm were similar in both groups at all time intervals and showed statistically significant improvement when compared with preoperative scores. In addition, fusion rate, subsidence, and postoperative complications were similar in both groups. Our results suggest that the use of cervical braces does not improve the clinical outcomes of individuals undergoing single- or double-level ACDF.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The segmental height was assessed at the lateral cervical X-rays. It was measured between the midpoint of the superior endplate of the upper vertebral body and the midpoint of the inferior endplate of the lower vertebral body. (A) Immediate postoperative X-ray (within 2 days after surgery) and (B) 12 months postoperative X-ray. This patient received C4-5 ACDF and was assessed to have subsidence as the segmental height loss was >2 mm at 12-month follow-up compared to the immediate postoperative state. ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Functional outcomes in the brace and non-brace groups at different time intervals. General pattern of the variation of the functional outcomes assessed through a linear mixed model in each group was not statistically different in (A) mJOA (P = .24), (B) VAS-neck (P = .46), and (C) VAS-arm (P = .10). mJOA = modified Japanese Orthopedic Association; VAS = visual analog scale. Statistically significant difference from the preoperative scores in the brace group. Statistically significant difference from the preoperative scores in the non-brace group.

References

    1. Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958;40-A:607–24. - PubMed
    1. Cloward RB. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg. 1958;15:602–17. - PubMed
    1. Scerrati A, Visani J, Norri N, Cavallo M, Giganti M, De Bonis P. Effect of external cervical orthoses on clinical and radiological outcome of patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Acta Neurochir. 2019;161:2195–200. - PubMed
    1. Karikari I, Ghogawala Z, Ropper AE, et al. . Utility of cervical collars following cervical fusion surgery. does it improve fusion rates or outcomes? A systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2018;124:423–9. - PubMed
    1. Hukuda S, Mochizuki T, Ogata M, Shichikawa K, Shimomura Y. Operations for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. A comparison of the results of anterior and posterior procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67-B:609–15. - PubMed

Publication types