Synchronous citizen science with dogs
- PMID: 38969907
- PMCID: PMC11226520
- DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01882-6
Synchronous citizen science with dogs
Abstract
Citizen science approaches have grown in popularity over the years, partly due to their ability to reach a wider audience and produce more generalizable samples. In dogs, these studies, though, have been limited in their controls over materials or experimental protocols, with guardians typically reporting results without researcher supervision. Over two studies, we explored and validated a synchronous citizen science approach. We had dog guardians act as experimenters while being supervised by a researcher over Zoom. In study 1, we demonstrated that synchronous citizen science produced equivalent levels of performance to in-lab designs in a choice task. Consistent with past in-lab research, dogs selected a treat (vs. an empty plate) in a two-alternative forced-choice task. In study 2, we showed that Zoom methods are also appropriate for studies utilizing looking time measures. We explored dogs' looking behaviors when a bag of treats was placed in an unreachable location, and dogs' guardians were either attentive or inattentive while dogs attempted to retrieve the treats. Consistent with past work, dogs in the attentive condition looked at their guardian for longer periods and had a shorter latency to first look than dogs in the inattentive condition. Overall, we have demonstrated that synchronous citizen science studies with dogs are feasible and produce valid results consistent with those found in a typical lab setting.
Keywords: Canine Cognition; Citizen Science; Decision Making; Domestic Dog; Social Cognition.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Citizen Science as a New Tool in Dog Cognition Research.PLoS One. 2015 Sep 16;10(9):e0135176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135176. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26376443 Free PMC article.
-
Citizen science: a new direction in canine behavior research.Behav Processes. 2015 Jan;110:125-32. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.014. Epub 2014 Nov 4. Behav Processes. 2015. PMID: 25444773
-
Agility and search and rescue training differently affects pet dogs' behaviour in socio-cognitive tasks.Behav Processes. 2009 Jul;81(3):416-22. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.03.015. Behav Processes. 2009. PMID: 19520242 Review.
-
Self-blinding citizen science to explore psychedelic microdosing.Elife. 2021 Mar 2;10:e62878. doi: 10.7554/eLife.62878. Elife. 2021. PMID: 33648632 Free PMC article.
-
In what sense are dogs special? Canine cognition in comparative context.Learn Behav. 2018 Dec;46(4):335-363. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0349-7. Learn Behav. 2018. PMID: 30251104 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Functional assessments of short-term spatial memory in the Dog Aging Project identify strong associations with age that are not moderated by body mass.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Jul 2:2025.06.30.662397. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.30.662397. bioRxiv. 2025. PMID: 40631245 Free PMC article. Preprint.
References
-
- Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting Linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1):1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
-
- Bensky MK, Gosling SD, Sinn DL (2013). The World from a Dog’s Point of View Elsevier 209-406
-
- Bräuer J (2014) Chapter 10—What Dogs Understand about Humans. In J. Kaminski & S. Marshall-Pescini (Eds.), The Social Dog (pp. 295–317). Academic Press. 10.1016/B978-0-12-407818-5.00010-3
-
- Bräuer J, Kaminski J, Riedel J, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) Making inferences about the location of hidden food: Social Dog, Causal ape. J Comp Psychol 120(1):38–47. 10.1037/0735-7036.120.1.38 - PubMed
-
- Bray EE, Gnanadesikan GE, Horschler DJ, Levy KM, Kennedy BS, Famula TR, MacLean EL (2021) Early-emerging and highly heritable sensitivity to human communication in dogs. Curr Biol 31(14):3132–3136e5. 10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.055 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous