Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 6;27(1):46.
doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01882-6.

Synchronous citizen science with dogs

Affiliations

Synchronous citizen science with dogs

Madeline H Pelgrim et al. Anim Cogn. .

Abstract

Citizen science approaches have grown in popularity over the years, partly due to their ability to reach a wider audience and produce more generalizable samples. In dogs, these studies, though, have been limited in their controls over materials or experimental protocols, with guardians typically reporting results without researcher supervision. Over two studies, we explored and validated a synchronous citizen science approach. We had dog guardians act as experimenters while being supervised by a researcher over Zoom. In study 1, we demonstrated that synchronous citizen science produced equivalent levels of performance to in-lab designs in a choice task. Consistent with past in-lab research, dogs selected a treat (vs. an empty plate) in a two-alternative forced-choice task. In study 2, we showed that Zoom methods are also appropriate for studies utilizing looking time measures. We explored dogs' looking behaviors when a bag of treats was placed in an unreachable location, and dogs' guardians were either attentive or inattentive while dogs attempted to retrieve the treats. Consistent with past work, dogs in the attentive condition looked at their guardian for longer periods and had a shorter latency to first look than dogs in the inattentive condition. Overall, we have demonstrated that synchronous citizen science studies with dogs are feasible and produce valid results consistent with those found in a typical lab setting.

Keywords: Canine Cognition; Citizen Science; Decision Making; Domestic Dog; Social Cognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Experimental Setup for Study 1. Note Left - Example photo of the setup with a dog and guardian. Right - Schematic of the setup from a top-down perspective. Dog guardians placed the 3 markers (1 for the dog to stand on, one for each of the 2 plates to be placed on) in advance. The Zoom-enabled device was placed so that both the plates and the dogs’ faces were all visible.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Experimental Setup for Study 2. Note Dogs first received warm-up trials (Left). Dogs then experienced either the Attentive (Middle) or Inattentive (Right) condition

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting Linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1):1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    1. Bensky MK, Gosling SD, Sinn DL (2013). The World from a Dog’s Point of View Elsevier 209-406
    1. Bräuer J (2014) Chapter 10—What Dogs Understand about Humans. In J. Kaminski & S. Marshall-Pescini (Eds.), The Social Dog (pp. 295–317). Academic Press. 10.1016/B978-0-12-407818-5.00010-3
    1. Bräuer J, Kaminski J, Riedel J, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) Making inferences about the location of hidden food: Social Dog, Causal ape. J Comp Psychol 120(1):38–47. 10.1037/0735-7036.120.1.38 - PubMed
    1. Bray EE, Gnanadesikan GE, Horschler DJ, Levy KM, Kennedy BS, Famula TR, MacLean EL (2021) Early-emerging and highly heritable sensitivity to human communication in dogs. Curr Biol 31(14):3132–3136e5. 10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.055 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources