Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 5;24(1):1790.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19277-0.

Benchmarking for healthy food stores: protocol for a randomised controlled trial with remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in Australia to enhance adoption of health-enabling store policy and practice

Affiliations

Benchmarking for healthy food stores: protocol for a randomised controlled trial with remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in Australia to enhance adoption of health-enabling store policy and practice

Julie Brimblecombe et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in remote Australia have initiated bold policies for health-enabling stores. Benchmarking, a data-driven and facilitated 'audit and feedback' with action planning process, provides a potential strategy to strengthen and scale health-enabling best-practice adoption by remote community store directors/owners. We aim to co-design a benchmarking model with five partner organisations and test its effectiveness with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community stores in remote Australia.

Methods: Study design is a pragmatic randomised controlled trial with consenting eligible stores (located in very remote Northern Territory (NT) of Australia, primary grocery store for an Aboriginal community, and serviced by a Nutrition Practitioner with a study partner organisation). The Benchmarking model is informed by research evidence, purpose-built best-practice audit and feedback tools, and co-designed with partner organisation and community representatives. The intervention comprises two full benchmarking cycles (one per year, 2022/23 and 2023/24) of assessment, feedback, action planning and action implementation. Assessment of stores includes i adoption status of 21 evidence-and industry-informed health-enabling policies for remote stores, ii implementation of health-enabling best-practice using a purpose-built Store Scout App, iii price of a standardised healthy diet using the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Healthy Diets ASAP protocol; and, iv healthiness of food purchasing using sales data indicators. Partner organisations feedback reports and co-design action plans with stores. Control stores receive assessments and continue with usual retail practice. All stores provide weekly electronic sales data to assess the primary outcome, change in free sugars (g) to energy (MJ) from all food and drinks purchased, baseline (July-December 2021) vs July-December 2023.

Discussion: We hypothesise that the benchmarking intervention can improve the adoption of health-enabling store policy and practice and reduce sales of unhealthy foods and drinks in remote community stores of Australia. This innovative research with remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities can inform effective implementation strategies for healthy food retail more broadly.

Trial registration: ACTRN12622000596707, Protocol version 1.

Keywords: Benchmarking; Continuous improvement; Diet; Health policy; Implementation strategy; Indigenous health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
SPIRIT Participant Flow Diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Timeline of intervention
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The benchmarking and continuous improvement cycle of assessment, feedback, action planning and implementation. Adapted from the PLAN-DO-COLLECT-LEARN cycle, Menzies School of Health Research [63]. This figure shows the four components of the cycle and the sharing of this information with store directors/owners as represented by the middle section of the figure. Artwork by Ngarrindjeri artist Jordan Lovegrove

Similar articles

References

    1. National Indigenous Australians Agency. House of representatives standing committee inquiry into food pricing and food security in remote indigenous communities. Submission 36. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2020.
    1. The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia . Report on food pricing and food security in remote Indigenous communities. Commonwealth of Australia: House of Representatives Standing Committee on Indigenous Affairs. Canberra; 2020.
    1. Butler R, Tapsell L, Lyons-Wall P. Trends in purchasing patterns of sugar-sweetened water-based beverages in a remote Aboriginal community store following the implementation of a community-developed store nutrition policy. Nutr Diet. 2011;68(2):115–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0080.2011.01515.x. - DOI
    1. Brimblecombe J, McMahon E, Ferguson M, De Silva K, Peeters A, Miles E, Wycherley T, Minaker L, Greenacre L, Gunther A, Chappell E, Chatfield MD, Mah CL. Effect of restricted retail merchandising of discretionary food and beverages on population diet: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Lancet Planet Health. 2020;4(10):e463–e473. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30202-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnhem Land Progress Aboriginal Corporation. https://www.alpa.asn.au/ [Accessed 1/07/2023]

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources