Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 5;17(1):186.
doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-06839-z.

At what risk? A research note on interviewer burden

Khadijah Melvin  1 , Erin Sweeney  1 , Katherine Buchman  2 , Eboni Winford  3 , Jessica Ansah  1 , Sandra Wairimu  1 , Will Martinez  1 , Judson Laughter  4   5 , Jennifer Jabson Tree  2
Affiliations

At what risk? A research note on interviewer burden

Khadijah Melvin et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Background: We report on our methodological experiences during an investigation of how institutional racism functions in healthcare. We found tension between balancing methodological rigor with the unanticipated consequence of interviewer burden.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and qualitatively analyzed using thematic content analysis. Interviewers also participated in weekly debriefing sessions and reported experiences with patients.

Results: Interviewers repeatedly experienced negative encounters with white patients during interviews. Themes included privilege to avoid racism, denial of racism, non-verbal discomfort, falsely claiming Native identities, and intimidation. These experiences were most pronounced with Black interviewers.

Discussion: Interviewer burden may need to be a consideration taken up in a variety of research contexts.

Keywords: FQHC; Institutional racism; Interviewer burden; Public health critical race praxis; Qualitative interview; Respondent burden.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Ford CL, Airhihenbuwa CO. The public health critical race methodology: praxis for antiracism research. Social Science & Medicine. 2010;71:1390–8. - PubMed
    1. World Medical Association. World medical association declaration of helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–4. 10.1001/jama.2103.281053 - PubMed
    1. Proser M. Deserving the spotlight: health centers provide high-quality and cost-effective care. J Ambul Care Manage. 2005;28(4):321–30. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services. 2019. Federally qualified health center. Updated September 2019. https://www.hhs.gov/guidance/sites/default/files/hhs-guidance-documents/.... Accessed 28 Mar 2024.
    1. Hardeman R. Examining racism in health services research: a disciplinary self-critique. Health Serv Res. 2020;55(Supple 2):777–80. 10.1111/1475-6773.13558 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources