Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul;13(13):e7329.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.7329.

Anticancer restrictive diets and the risk of psychological distress: Review and perspectives

Valentina Da Prat  1 , Gabriella Pravettoni  2   3 , Amanda Casirati  1 , Chiara Marzorati  2 , Paolo Pedrazzoli  4   5 , Riccardo Caccialanza  1
Affiliations
Review

Anticancer restrictive diets and the risk of psychological distress: Review and perspectives

Valentina Da Prat et al. Cancer Med. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: The most studied anticancer restrictive diets include fasting, fasting-mimicking diets (FMDs) and ketogenic diets (KDs). Besides the current lack of established clinical benefit and the significant risk of malnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies, dietary restrictions in cancer patients might have relevant psychological effects.

Materials and methods: We reviewed the randomized and non-randomized controlled clinical trials (CCTs) reporting data on the psychological impact of fasting, FMDs and KDs in cancer patients. We excluded trials on restrictive diets performed for weight reduction in obese or overweight patients, studies on dietary restrictions lasting less than 24 h, and studies on fasting related to cultural or religious beliefs.

Results: Three CCTs on fasting or FMDs and eight CCTs on KDs in cancer patients were included. In terms of diet-related distress, emotional, social, and family well-being, none of these studies showed a detrimental impact of fasting, FMDs and KDs. However, clinical trials specifically assessing the psychological aspects in the long term are lacking.

Conclusions and perspectives: In the absence of a conclusive evidence on the clinical benefits of restrictive diets, which carry significant risks especially if unsupervised, further studies are needed to clarify their psychological impact in cancer patients. Multidisciplinary approaches including psychological evaluations should be used to ameliorate patient selection for clinical trials, identify early distress symptoms, and increase patient compliance to dietary recommendations.

Keywords: fast‐mimicking diet; ketogenic diet; nutrition; psychological distress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article.

References

    1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646‐674. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Warburg O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science. 1956;123:309‐314. doi:10.1126/science.123.3191.309 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buono R, Longo VD. Starvation, stress resistance, and cancer. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2018;29(4):271‐280. doi:10.1016/j.tem.2018.01.008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Israël M, Berg E, Tenenbaum G. Cancer metabolism: fasting reset, the keto‐paradox and drugs for undoing. J Clin Med. 2023;12:1589. doi:10.3390/jcm12041589 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martínez‐Garay C, Djouder N. Dietary interventions and precision nutrition in cancer therapy. Trends Mol Med. 2023;29(7):489‐511. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2023.04.004 - DOI - PubMed