Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Aug;11(8):2008-2015.
doi: 10.1002/acn3.52118. Epub 2024 Jul 5.

A comparison of natalizumab and ocrelizumab on disease progression in multiple sclerosis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparison of natalizumab and ocrelizumab on disease progression in multiple sclerosis

Pietro Iaffaldano et al. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: No direct comparisons of the effect of natalizumab and ocrelizumab on progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) and relapse-associated worsening (RAW) events are currently available. We aimed to compare the risk of achieving first 6 months confirmed PIRA and RAW events and irreversible Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 4.0 and 6.0 in a cohort of naïve patients treated with natalizumab or ocrelizumab from the Italian Multiple Sclerosis Register.

Methods: Patients with a first visit within 1 year from onset, treated with natalizumab or ocrelizumab, and ≥3 visits were extracted. Pairwise propensity score-matched analyses were performed. Risk of reaching the first PIRA, RAW, and EDSS 4.0 and 6.0 events were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to show cumulative probabilities of reaching outcomes.

Results: In total, 770 subjects were included (natalizumab = 568; ocrelizumab = 212) and the propensity score-matching retrieved 195 pairs. No RAW events were found in natalizumab group and only 1 was reported in ocrelizumab group. A first PIRA event was reached by 23 natalizumab and 25 ocrelizumab exposed patients; 7 natalizumab- and 10 ocrelizumab-treated patients obtained an irreversible EDSS 4.0, while 13 natalizumab- and 15 ocrelizumab-treated patients reached an irreversible EDSS 6.0. No differences between the two groups were found in the risk (HR, 95%CI) of reaching a first PIRA (1.04, 0.59-1.84; p = 0.88) event, an irreversible EDSS 4.0 (1.23, 0.57-2.66; p = 0.60) and 6.0 (0.93, 0.32-2.68; p = 0.89).

Interpretation: Both medications strongly suppress RAW events and, in the short term, the risk of achieving PIRA events, EDSS 4.0 and 6.0 milestones is not significantly different.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest with respect to the contents of the current study, but note that the patients in the study were treated with a number of disease‐modifying drugs and that authors have received advisory board, membership, speakers honoraria, travel support, research grants, consulting fees, or clinical trial support from the manufacturers of those drugs, including Actelion, Allergan, Almirall, Alexion, Bayer Schering, Biogen, Celgene, Excemed, Genzyme, Forward Pharma, Ipsen, Medday, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Sanofi, Roche, Teva, and their local affiliates.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the patients' selection procedure. I‐MS&RD, Italian MS and Related Disorders Register; NTZ, natalizumab; OCR, ocrelizumab.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of patients reaching a first PIRA event, irreversible EDSS 4.0 and 6.0 in NTZ and OCR treatment groups of the matched cohort. NTZ, natalizumab; OCR, ocrelizumab; PIRA, progression independent of relapse activity; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cumulative incidence of PIRA (A), irreversible EDSS 4.0 (B) and irreversible EDSS 6.0 (C) in NTZ‐ and OCR‐treated patients. NTZ, natalizumab; OCR, ocrelizumab; PIRA, progression independent of relapse activity; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

References

    1. Lublin FD, Häring DA, Ganjgahi H, et al. How patients with multiple sclerosis acquire disability. Brain. 2022;145(9):3147‐3161. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Portaccio E, Bellinvia A, Fonderico M, et al. Progression is independent of relapse activity in early multiple sclerosis: a real‐life cohort study. Brain. 2022;145(8):2796‐2805. - PubMed
    1. University of California, San Francisco MS‐EPIC Team , Cree BAC, Hollenbach JA, et al. Silent progression in disease activity‐free relapsing multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2019;85(5):653‐666. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kappos L, Wolinsky JS, Giovannoni G, et al. Contribution of relapse‐independent progression vs relapse‐associated worsening to overall confirmed disability accumulation in typical relapsing multiple sclerosis in a pooled analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(9):1132‐1140. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hauser SL, Cree BAC. Treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review. Am J Med. 2020;133(12):1380‐1390.e2. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources