A comparison of natalizumab and ocrelizumab on disease progression in multiple sclerosis
- PMID: 38970214
- PMCID: PMC11330227
- DOI: 10.1002/acn3.52118
A comparison of natalizumab and ocrelizumab on disease progression in multiple sclerosis
Abstract
Objective: No direct comparisons of the effect of natalizumab and ocrelizumab on progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) and relapse-associated worsening (RAW) events are currently available. We aimed to compare the risk of achieving first 6 months confirmed PIRA and RAW events and irreversible Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 4.0 and 6.0 in a cohort of naïve patients treated with natalizumab or ocrelizumab from the Italian Multiple Sclerosis Register.
Methods: Patients with a first visit within 1 year from onset, treated with natalizumab or ocrelizumab, and ≥3 visits were extracted. Pairwise propensity score-matched analyses were performed. Risk of reaching the first PIRA, RAW, and EDSS 4.0 and 6.0 events were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to show cumulative probabilities of reaching outcomes.
Results: In total, 770 subjects were included (natalizumab = 568; ocrelizumab = 212) and the propensity score-matching retrieved 195 pairs. No RAW events were found in natalizumab group and only 1 was reported in ocrelizumab group. A first PIRA event was reached by 23 natalizumab and 25 ocrelizumab exposed patients; 7 natalizumab- and 10 ocrelizumab-treated patients obtained an irreversible EDSS 4.0, while 13 natalizumab- and 15 ocrelizumab-treated patients reached an irreversible EDSS 6.0. No differences between the two groups were found in the risk (HR, 95%CI) of reaching a first PIRA (1.04, 0.59-1.84; p = 0.88) event, an irreversible EDSS 4.0 (1.23, 0.57-2.66; p = 0.60) and 6.0 (0.93, 0.32-2.68; p = 0.89).
Interpretation: Both medications strongly suppress RAW events and, in the short term, the risk of achieving PIRA events, EDSS 4.0 and 6.0 milestones is not significantly different.
© 2024 The Author(s). Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest with respect to the contents of the current study, but note that the patients in the study were treated with a number of disease‐modifying drugs and that authors have received advisory board, membership, speakers honoraria, travel support, research grants, consulting fees, or clinical trial support from the manufacturers of those drugs, including Actelion, Allergan, Almirall, Alexion, Bayer Schering, Biogen, Celgene, Excemed, Genzyme, Forward Pharma, Ipsen, Medday, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Sanofi, Roche, Teva, and their local affiliates.
Figures
References
-
- Portaccio E, Bellinvia A, Fonderico M, et al. Progression is independent of relapse activity in early multiple sclerosis: a real‐life cohort study. Brain. 2022;145(8):2796‐2805. - PubMed
-
- Kappos L, Wolinsky JS, Giovannoni G, et al. Contribution of relapse‐independent progression vs relapse‐associated worsening to overall confirmed disability accumulation in typical relapsing multiple sclerosis in a pooled analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(9):1132‐1140. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
