"I got to say two or three lines"-A systematic review of children's participation in child protective services
- PMID: 38971702
- DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106934
"I got to say two or three lines"-A systematic review of children's participation in child protective services
Abstract
Background: Although children's right to participate in decisions that influence their lives is widely recognized, it is rarely present in the assessment and decision-making processes in child protective services (CPS).
Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to examine children's views and experiences of participating in CPS cases of child abuse and neglect and to identify the gap in scientific knowledge.
Methods: The systematic review follows the PRISMA statement and includes 13 peer-reviewed articles published in several academic journals from 2016 to 2023 reporting primary research with abused and neglected children registered in CPS.
Results: Thematic analysis identified five main themes: participation: assessment and decision-making, information and understanding, interaction and relationships, children vs parents, and experience of younger children. The findings show that although a few children reported instances of meaningful participation, overall, children's participation was often reduced to a tokenistic engagement, with limited influence on the decision-making processes. Children, especially younger children, receive insufficient information and struggle to understand the proceedings. Examples of prioritizing parents' views, needs, and rights rather than centering the children's perspectives are reported.
Conclusions: The findings highlight a need for significant changes in how child participation is conceptualized and operationalized within CPS. Implications for practice, policy, and research are discussed to foster children's participation in CPS to contribute to the effective care and protection of children experiencing child abuse and neglect.
Keywords: Child abuse; Child neglect; Child participation; Child protective services; Systematic review; children's perspective.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors report no potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Children's participation in consultations and decision-making at health service level: a review of the literature.Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Nov;45(11):1682-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.05.002. Epub 2008 Aug 15. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008. PMID: 18706560 Review.
-
Children's active participation in decision-making processes during hospitalisation: An observational study.J Clin Nurs. 2019 Dec;28(23-24):4525-4537. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15042. Epub 2019 Sep 17. J Clin Nurs. 2019. PMID: 31430412 Free PMC article.
-
Parents' and children's experiences of participating in a randomized controlled clinical trial: AIDIT-QS.Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024 Dec;19(1):2408829. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2408829. Epub 2024 Oct 3. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024. PMID: 39360673 Free PMC article.
-
Defining child neglect based on child protective services data.Child Abuse Negl. 2005 May;29(5):493-511. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.09.024. Child Abuse Negl. 2005. PMID: 15970322
-
Children's and parents' experiences of home care provided by hospital staff: A scoping review.J Clin Nurs. 2024 Aug;33(8):3018-3032. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17109. Epub 2024 Mar 13. J Clin Nurs. 2024. PMID: 38481092
Cited by
-
Systematic review of child maltreatment screening tools used by different occupational groups: a study protocol.BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 7;14(11):e089623. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089623. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39510771 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous