Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep;207(2):235-252.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07388-6. Epub 2024 Jul 6.

The association between infectious agents and breast cancer: a review of the epidemiologic evidence

Affiliations
Review

The association between infectious agents and breast cancer: a review of the epidemiologic evidence

Kristen D Brantley et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: Several viruses have been casually linked to human cancers, including cervical, nasopharyngeal, liver, sarcoma, and Merkel cell carcinomas. However, the etiologic contribution of viral infections to breast cancer, the number one incident cancer among women worldwide, is not well established. Among studies exploring associations of viruses with breast cancer, potential linkages have been identified between breast cancer and five viruses: beta retrovirus, (i.e., mouse mammary tumor virus), human papillomavirus, Epstein Barr virus. bovine leukemia virus, and human cytomegalovirus.

Methods: In this review, we provide a comprehensive evaluation of epidemiological ecologic, case-control, case-only, and cohort studies investigating these associations. We discuss results from several existing reviews and meta-analyses, evaluate epidemiological studies published in the past five years, and assess the relationship between these viruses and breast tumor clinicopathological factors.

Results: The strongest epidemiological evidence for a viral role in breast cancer exists for MMTV and HPV, though limitations include lack of prospective studies for MMTV and potential detection bias in HPV studies. Viral detection challenges have limited studies of EBV and HCMV. Fewer studies have evaluated BLV, and though it has been associated with higher risk of breast cancer, sample sizes are quite small. CONCLUSION: While epidemiologic evidence exists for an association between these five viruses and breast cancer, various methodological issues and lack of prospective studies preclude robust conclusions. Future research should prioritize establishing a temporal relationship between infection and disease, minimizing misclassification of detection assays, and further exploring the influence of co-infections.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Oncogenic viruses; Viral infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Patel C, Brotherton JM, Pillsbury A et al (2018) The impact of 10 years of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in Australia: what additional disease burden will a nonavalent vaccine prevent? Euro Surveill 23(41):1700737. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.41.1700737 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hill AB (1965) The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med 58(5):295–300 - PubMed - PMC
    1. Zur HH (2002) Papillomaviruses and cancer: from basic studies to clinical application. Nat rev cancer 2(5):342–350 - DOI
    1. Vonka V (2000) Causality in medicine: the case of tumours and viruses. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 355(1404):1831–1841. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2000.0738 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources