Lactococcus lactis MA5 is a potential autochthonous probiotic for nutrient digestibility enhancement and bacterial pathogen inhibition in hybrid catfish (Ictalurus punctatus × I. furcatus)
- PMID: 38973153
- DOI: 10.1111/jfd.13997
Lactococcus lactis MA5 is a potential autochthonous probiotic for nutrient digestibility enhancement and bacterial pathogen inhibition in hybrid catfish (Ictalurus punctatus × I. furcatus)
Abstract
With the emergence of diseases, the U.S. catfish industry is under challenge. Current trends prefer autochthonous bacteria as potential probiotic candidates owing to their adaptability and capacity to effectively colonize the host's intestine, which can enhance production performance and bolster disease resistance. The objective of this study was to isolate an autochthonous bacterium as probiotic for hybrid catfish. Initially, an analysis of the intestinal microbiota of hybrid catfish reared in earthen ponds was conducted for subsequent probiotic development. Twenty lactic acid bacteria were isolated from the digesta of overperforming catfish, and most of the candidates demonstrated probiotic traits, including proteolytic and lipolytic abilities; antagonistic inhibition of catfish enteric bacterial pathogens, negative haemolytic activity and antibiotic susceptibility. Subsequent to this screening process, an isolate of Lactococcus lactis (MA5) was deemed the most promising probiotic candidate. In silico analyses were conducted, and several potential probiotic functions were predicted, including essential amino acids and vitamin synthesis. Moreover, genes for three bacteriocins, lactococcin A, enterolysin A and sactipeptide BmbF, were identified. Lastly, various protectant media for lyophilization of MA5 were assessed. These findings suggest that Lactococcus lactis MA5 can be an autochthonous probiotic from hybrid catfish, holding promise to be further tested in feeding trials.
Keywords: autochthonous probiotic; bacteriocins; intestinal microbiota; lyophilization preservation; probiotics; whole‐genome sequencing.
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Alderman, D. J., & Hastings, T. S. (1998). Antibiotic use in aquaculture: Development of antibiotic resistance – Potential for consumer health risks. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 33(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1365‐2621.1998.3320139.X
-
- Allameh, S. K., Noaman, V., & Nahav, R. (2017). Effects of probiotic bacteria on fish performance. Advanced Techniques in Clinical Microbiology, 1(2), 11.
-
- Amin, M., Adams, M. B., Burke, C. M., Christopher, M., & Bolch, C. J. S. (2023). Screening and activity of potential gastrointestinal probiotic lactic acid bacteria against Yersinia ruckeri O1b. Journal of Fish Diseases, 46(4), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/JFD.13750
-
- Andani, H. R. R., Tukmechi, A., Meshkini, S., & Sheikhzadeh, N. (2012). Antagonistic activity of two potential probiotic bacteria from fish intestines and investigation of their effects on growth performance and immune response in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 28(5), 728–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1439‐0426.2012.01974.X
-
- Anisimova, E. A., & Yarullina, D. R. (2019). Antibiotic resistance of Lactobacillus strains. Current Microbiology, 76(12), 1407–1416. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00284‐019‐01769‐7/TABLES/3
MeSH terms
Associated data
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
