Published Erratum
doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoae044.
eCollection 2024.
Correction to: Fresh and cumulative live birth rates in mild versus conventional stimulation for IVF cycles in poor ovarian responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 38974323
- PMCID: PMC11224910
- DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoae044
Item in Clipboard
Published Erratum
Correction to: Fresh and cumulative live birth rates in mild versus conventional stimulation for IVF cycles in poor ovarian responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hum Reprod Open.
.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa066.].
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.
Erratum for
-
Fresh and cumulative live birth rates in mild versus conventional stimulation for IVF cycles in poor ovarian responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hum Reprod Open. 2021 Feb 14;2021(1):hoaa066. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa066. eCollection 2021. Hum Reprod Open. 2021. PMID: 33614987 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
Fresh and cumulative live birth rates in mild versus conventional stimulation for IVF cycles in poor ovarian responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hum Reprod Open. 2021 Feb 14;2021(1):hoaa066. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa066. eCollection 2021. Hum Reprod Open. 2021. PMID: 33614987 Free PMC article.
-
Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?Hum Reprod. 2016 Feb;31(2):370-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev316. Epub 2016 Jan 2. Hum Reprod. 2016. PMID: 26724797
-
Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer: Cumulative live birth rates of 7,236 IVF cycles.JBRA Assist Reprod. 2022 Aug 4;26(3):450-459. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210094. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2022. PMID: 35191632 Free PMC article.
-
Higher probability of live-birth in high, but not normal, responders after first frozen-embryo transfer in a freeze-only cycle strategy compared to fresh-embryo transfer: a meta-analysis.Hum Reprod. 2019 Mar 1;34(3):491-505. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey388. Hum Reprod. 2019. PMID: 30689865
-
Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF in poor responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Aug;41(2):225-238. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Mar 14. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020. PMID: 32546333
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources