Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 3:12:e17677.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.17677. eCollection 2024.

Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and shear-wave elastography for small breast nodules

Yan Shen #  1 , Jie He #  1 , Miao Liu  1 , Jiaojiao Hu  1 , Yonglin Wan  1 , Tingting Zhang  1 , Jun Ding  2 , Jiangnan Dong  3 , Xiaohong Fu  1
Affiliations

Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and shear-wave elastography for small breast nodules

Yan Shen et al. PeerJ. .

Abstract

Background: The study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and shear-wave elastography (SWE) in detecting small malignant breast nodules in an effort to inform further refinements of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification system.

Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed patients with breast nodules who underwent conventional ultrasound, CEUS, and SWE at Gongli Hospital from November 2015 to December 2019. The inclusion criteria were nodules ≤ 2 cm in diameter with pathological outcomes determined by biopsy, no prior treatments, and solid or predominantly solid nodules. The exclusion criteria included pregnancy or lactation and low-quality images. Imaging features were detailed and classified per BI-RADS. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves.

Results: The study included 302 patients with 305 breast nodules, 113 of which were malignant. The diagnostic accuracy was significantly improved by combining the BI-RADS classification with CEUS and SWE. The combined approach yielded a sensitivity of 88.5%, specificity of 87.0%, positive predictive value of 80.0%, negative predictive value of 92.8%, and accuracy of 87.5% with an area under the curve of 0.877. Notably, 55.8% of BI-RADS 4A nodules were downgraded to BI-RADS 3 and confirmed as benign after pathological examination, suggesting the potential to avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Conclusion: The integrated use of the BI-RADS classification, CEUS, and SWE enhances the accuracy of differentiating benign and malignant small breast nodule, potentially reducing the need for unnecessary biopsies.

Keywords: BI-RADS classification; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Shear-wave elastography; Small breast nodule; Ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of patient selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2. (A) An irregular and uncircumscribed nodule classified as BI-RADS 4A. (B) CEUS revealed no significant enhancement, and the volume decreased after enhancement. (C) The average SWV on SWE was 2.8 m/s, which was below the cutoff, indicating that the texture of the nodules was soft. After combining BI-RADS, CEUS, and SWE, the BI-RADS category was downgraded to BI-RADS 3. The final pathological result was breast adenopathy. (D) The nodule was not circumscribed and not parallel, and it was classified as BI-RADS 4A. (E) CEUS displayed high enhancement and an increased volume after enhancement. (F) The average SWV on SWE was 4.1 m/s, which exceeded the cutoff, indicating that the nodule was hard.
After combining BI-RADS, CEUS, and SWE, the BI-RADS category was upgraded to BI-RADS 4B. The final pathological result was ductal carcinoma in situ. BI-RADS, Breast Imaging Reporting, and Data System; SWV, shear-wave velocity; SWE, shear-wave elastography; CEUS, contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curves of the four methods.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aouad P, Saikali M, Abdel-Samad R, Fostok S, El-Houjeiri L, Pisano C, Talhouk R, Darwiche N. Antitumor activities of the synthetic retinoid ST1926 in two-dimensional and three-dimensional human breast cancer models. Anti-Cancer Drugs. 2017;28:757–770. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000511. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bae JM, Kim EH. Breast density and risk of breast cancer in Asian women: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health. 2016;49:367–375. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.16.054. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonsu AB, Ncama BP. Evidence of promoting prevention and the early detection of breast cancer among women, a hospital-based education and screening interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol. Systematic Reviews. 2018;7:234. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0889-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Broach RB, Geha R, Englander BS, De LaCruz L, Thrash H, Brooks AD. A cost-effective handheld breast scanner for use in low-resource environments: a validation study. World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2016;14:277. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-1022-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Castro SM, Tseytlin E, Medvedeva O, Mitchell K, Visweswaran S, Bekhuis T, Jacobson RS. Automated annotation and classification of BI-RADS assessment from radiology reports. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2017;69:177–187. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.04.011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources