Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 21;10(2):264-273.
doi: 10.21037/jss-23-104. Epub 2024 May 8.

Analysis of antibiotic regimens and outcomes in spinal brucellosis: insights from a retrospective cohort study in Makkah, Saudi Arabia

Affiliations

Analysis of antibiotic regimens and outcomes in spinal brucellosis: insights from a retrospective cohort study in Makkah, Saudi Arabia

Abdulaziz S Aljuaid et al. J Spine Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease that is widely spread across the globe, with the number of cases increasing annually. Spinal brucellosis is known to affect about half of patients with brucellosis. Nevertheless, data on the optimal antibiotic regimens for spinal brucellosis are limited. Therefore, this study aims to compare antibiotic treatment regimens for spinal brucellosis at our center in Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of an 11-year period from 2010 to 2021 conducted at a single center in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. All patients with spinal brucellosis were included. Patients were excluded if the duration of the received antibiotic regimen or follow-up was poorly documented. Data analysis was conducted using RStudio (R version 4.1.1). Categorical variables of each regimen used by the patients were presented as frequencies and percentages, while numerical variables were summarized using the median and interquartile range (IQR).

Results: A total of 35 patients were included; the median (IQR) age of the patients was 58.0 (48.0 to 63.0) years. The most frequently reported symptoms upon admission included low back pain (83.3%). The most frequently administered regimen was the combination of streptomycin + doxycycline + rifampicin (SDR) (20 patients, 55.6%), followed by the combination of streptomycin + rifampicin + trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SRT) (eight patients, 22.2%). Overall, out of the total 35 patients who received first-line treatment, only six patients experienced therapy failure. Out of the total six patients who experienced first-line treatment failure with SDR (five patients, 83%) and SDT (one patient, 17%), surgery was indicated for three patients. Surgical intervention was deemed necessary in 12 patients (34%). Three patients chose not to undergo surgical intervention but still showed complete improvement upon completing the treatment duration. One patient experienced a postoperative complication, resulting in paraplegia.

Conclusions: In this study, we found that among 35 patients, treatment failure was observed only in six patients who received triple therapy. In addition, surgical intervention was indicated in 12 patients; however, three patients refused surgery and improved ultimately after changing or extending the duration of the antibiotic regimen.

Keywords: Brucellosis; anti-bacterial agents; spondylitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jss.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jss-23-104/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cohort study flowchart outlines and sample enrollment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The percentages of presenting symptoms among the included patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
First-line regimen of therapy among the included patients. mo., months; GDC, gentamicin + doxycycline + ciprofloxacin; SRC, streptomycin + rifampicin + ciprofloxacin; SDR, streptomycin + doxycycline + rifampicin; SRT, streptomycin + rifampicin + trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; GTC, gentamicin + trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole + ciprofloxacin; SDT, streptomycin + doxycycline + trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; DS, doxycycline + streptomycin; SR, streptomycin + rifampicin.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID) D of HCP and P (DHCPP). Brucellosis. 2019. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/brucellosis/index.html
    1. Dadar M, Fakhri Y, Shahali Y, et al. Contamination of milk and dairy products by Brucella species: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. Food Res Int 2020;128:108775. 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108775 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dean AS, Crump L, Greter H, et al. Global burden of human brucellosis: a systematic review of disease frequency. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2012;6:e1865. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001865 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brucellosis - Epidemiology. BMJ Best Practice 2019. Available online: https://bestpractice.bmj.com/topics/en-us/911
    1. Saudi National Registry of Ministry of Health. Statistical Yearbook. 2019:178-9. Available online: https://www.moh.gov.sa/en/Ministry/Statistics/book/Pages/default.aspx

LinkOut - more resources