Intracranial pressure monitoring for severe traumatic brain injury: A retrospective study of 273 consecutive patients
- PMID: 38974553
- PMCID: PMC11225394
- DOI: 10.25259/SNI_221_2024
Intracranial pressure monitoring for severe traumatic brain injury: A retrospective study of 273 consecutive patients
Abstract
Background: Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is essential in severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) cases; yet, the frequency of high ICP occurrences remains debated. This study presents a 9-year analysis of ICP monitoring using intraventricular catheters among sTBI patients.
Methods: A retrospective review of 1760 sTBI patients (Glasgow Coma Score <9) admitted between January 2011 and December 2019 was conducted. Of these, 280 patients meeting monitoring criteria were included based on Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) Guidelines. ICP was monitored using intraventricular catheters through right frontal burr holes. Initial ICP readings were recorded intraoperatively, followed by continuous monitoring. Patients with ICP >20 mmHg for 10-15 min during 72 h were categorized with high ICP. Data collected included demographics, computed tomography (CT) findings, intra- and post-operative ICP, and complications.
Results: Of 273 patients, 228 were male and 45 females, aged 18-80 (71.30% aged 18-45). Traffic accidents were the primary cause (90.48%). Fifty-two-point seventy-five percent experienced high ICP, correlating significantly with subdural hematoma (P < 0.001), intraventricular hemorrhage (P < 0.013), and compressed basal cisterns (P = 0.046) on initial CT. Twenty patients (7.3%) developed meningitis. Lower mortality rates and improved outcomes were observed in the low ICP group across discharge 3-and 6-month follow-ups.
Conclusion: Adherence to BTF guidelines yielded a 52.75% high ICP rate. Significant correlations were found between high ICP and specific CT abnormalities. This study underscores the benefits of ICP monitoring in selected sTBI cases, suggesting a need to review criteria for initiating monitoring protocols.
Keywords: Functional outcome; Intracranial pressure monitoring; Severe traumatic brain injury.
Copyright: © 2024 Surgical Neurology International.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
- 
    - Aiolfi A, Khor D, Cho J, Benjamin E, Inaba K, Demetriades D. Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe blunt head trauma: Does the type of monitoring device matter? J Neurosurg. 2018;128:828–33. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Biersteker HA, Andriessen TM, Horn J, Franschman G, van der Naalt J, Hoedemaekers CW, et al. Factors influencing intracranial pressure monitoring guideline compliance and outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:1914–22. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Carney N, Totten AM, O’Reilly C, Ullman JS, Hawryluk GW, Bell MJ, et al. Brain Trauma Foundation. 2016. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury 4th edition; p. 244. Available from: https://braintraumaorg/uploads/03/12guidelines_for_management_of_severe_... [Last accessed on 2019 Jun 26]
 
- 
    - Dawes AJ, Sacks GD, Cryer HG, Gruen JP, Preston C, Gorospe D, et al. Intracranial pressure monitoring and inpatient mortality in severe traumatic brain injury: A propensity score–matched analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78:492–502. - PubMed
 
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
