Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Mar;19(1):122-128.
doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.134122. Epub 2023 Dec 29.

Minimally invasive autopsy - endoscopic approach to post-mortem diagnostics

Affiliations
Review

Minimally invasive autopsy - endoscopic approach to post-mortem diagnostics

Paweł Świderski et al. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

The noticeable decline in the number of autopsies performed in recent years requires investigation into the causes of the phenomenon and attempts to prevent it. One potential cause of this trend is fear of disfiguring the body. Carrying out autopsies using a minimally invasive method may reduce the decrease in the number of autopsies performed. The first work on the development of the method and its continuation gave promising results. This allows us to start a discussion on attempts to introduce the method. The solution seems especially justified when the alternative is to completely abandon post-mortem examinations using the traditional method. Laparoscopy and thoracoscopy are tools that allow for accurate imaging and analysis of organ changes. Enriching them with additional tests using endoscopic techniques may have a positive impact on the accuracy of autopsy diagnoses. The development of a clear protocol for minimally invasive post-mortem diagnosis requires further research to determine the accuracy of the method.

Keywords: autopsy; diagnostic methods; minimally invasive diagnostics; post-mortem diagnostics; post-mortem laparoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ghosh SK. Human cadaveric dissection: a historical account from ancient Greece to the modern era. Anat Cell Biol 2015; 48: 153-69. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ayoub T, Chow J. The conventional autopsy in modern medicine. J R Soc Med 2008; 101: 177-81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Long Z, Lu P, Grooms T, et al. . Molecular evaluation of biopsy and autopsy specimens from patients receiving in vivo retroviral gene therapy. Hum Gene Ther 1999; 10: 733-40. - PubMed
    1. Cacchione RN, Sayad P, Pecoraro AM, Ferzli GS. Laparoscopic autopsies. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 619-22. - PubMed
    1. Fan JKM, Tong DKH, Poon JTC, et al. . Multimodality minimally invasive autopsy – a feasible and accurate approach to post-mortem examination. Forensic Sci Int 2010; 195: 93-8. - PubMed