Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 27;8(7):igae052.
doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae052. eCollection 2024.

A Novel Dual-Language Touch-Screen Intervention to Slow Down Cognitive Decline in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations

A Novel Dual-Language Touch-Screen Intervention to Slow Down Cognitive Decline in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Wei Quin Yow et al. Innov Aging. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Bilingualism has been suggested to protect older adults from cognitive aging and delay the onset of dementia. However, no studies have systematically explored bilingual usage as a tool to mitigate age-related cognitive decline. We developed the Dual-Language Intervention in Semantic memory-Computerized (DISC), a novel cognitive training program with three training tasks (object categorization, verbal fluency, and utility of things) designed specifically for older adults that featured two modes: single-language (SL) exposure mode and dual-language (DL) exposure mode.

Research design and methods: The final sample included 50 cognitively healthy (CH; 33 female, M age = 72.93 years, range = 53.08-87.43 years) and 48 cognitively impaired (CI; 35 female, M age = 80.93 years, range = 62.31-96.67 years) older adults, randomly assigned them into one of three groups: SL group, DL group, and control group (no training). Participants in SL and DL groups used DISC in either SL mode (i.e., training instructions were spoken in only one language throughout the entire training) or DL mode (i.e., training instructions alternated between two languages), respectively, for 24 sessions. Participants in the control group were asked to continue with their normal daily activities (e.g., playing bingo and reading newspapers).

Results: For CH older adults, we found significant improvements in the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) Trial 5 score and the Clock Drawing Test score in the DL group but not in the SL and control groups posttraining compared with pretraining. For CI older adults, there was a delayed improvement in the RAVLT Trial 1, six months later.

Discussion and implications: Our findings provided novel evidence that implementing DL cognitive training benefits CH older adult's late verbal learning and visuospatial construction skills, and a delayed improvement in CI older adults' early verbal learning abilities.

Keywords: Bilingualism; Cognitive intervention; Cognitively impaired; Dementia; Verbal memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart depicting the procedure of the study data collection. CI = cognitively impaired; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Key features of DISC cognitive training program. DISC = Dual-Language Intervention in Semantic memory—Computerized.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Comparisons between pretraining and posttraining by Treatment groups for (a) Clock Drawing Test score; and (b) RAVLT Trial 5 score in the cognitively healthy older adults. SL = single-language group; DL = dual-language group. Error bars indicate standard errors. Asterisks indicate significant differences between pretraining and posttraining. * p < .05. *** p < .001.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Comparisons between (a) pretraining and follow-up; and (b) posttraining and follow-up by Treatment groups for RAVLT trial 1 score. SL = single-language group; DL = dual-language group. Error bars indicate standard errors. The p-value and Cohen’s d indicate the significance and the effect size of the difference between pretraining and follow-up. Asterisks indicate significant differences between posttraining and follow-up. * p < .05.

Similar articles

References

    1. Afthinos, A., Themistocleous, C., Herrmann, O., Fan, H., Lu, H., & Tsapkini, K. (2022). The contribution of working memory areas to verbal learning and recall in primary progressive aphasia. Frontiers in Neurology, 13, 698200. 10.3389/fneur.2022.698200 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson, J. A. E., Hawrylewicz, K., & Grundy, J. G. (2020). Does bilingualism protect against dementia? A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(5), 952–965. 10.3758/s13423-020-01736-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Antón, E., Fernández García, Y., Carreiras, M., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2016). Does bilingualism shape inhibitory control in the elderly? Journal of Memory and Language, 90, 147–160. 10.1016/j.jml.2016.04.007 - DOI
    1. Antoniou, M., Gunasekera, G. M., & Wong, P. C. M. (2013). Foreign language training as cognitive therapy for age-related cognitive decline: A hypothesis for future research. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(10), 2689–2698. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.09.004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bak, T. (2016). Language lessons to help protect against dementia. BMJ, i5039. 10.1136/bmj.i5039 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources