Improving Theatre Productivity by Digitising Surgical Equipment Repairs
- PMID: 38975507
- PMCID: PMC11227270
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61802
Improving Theatre Productivity by Digitising Surgical Equipment Repairs
Abstract
Introduction A few cancelled surgeries are due to surgical equipment issues representing a significant burden to both patients and National Health Service (NHS) hospitals on waiting lists. Despite this, there remain very few strategies designed to tackle these avoidable cancellations, especially in combination with digitisation. Our aim was to demonstrate improved efficiency through a pilot study in collaboration with Broomfield Hospital (Broomfield, United Kingdom), MediShout Ltd (London, United Kingdom), and B. Braun Medical Ltd (Sheffield, United Kingdom) with the digitalisation of the equipment repair pathway. Methods MediShout digitised two distinct repair pathways: ad-hoc repairs and maintenance equipment services (MES). Pre- and post-digitisation outcome measures were collected including the number of process steps, staff contribution time, non-staff continuation time, turnaround time, cancelled surgeries, planned preventative maintenance compliance, and staff satisfaction. The number of steps, staff contribution time, and non-staff contribution time were calculated using cognitive task analyses and time-motion studies, respectively. Turnaround time and cancellation data were taken from existing hospital data sets and staff satisfaction was measured through two staff surveys. Results Digitising the ad-hoc repair pathway reduced the number of steps by 18 (118 to 100) and saved 74 minutes of total staff time (Broomfield Hospital and B. Braun) per repair, resulting in annual efficiency savings of £21,721.48. Digitising the MES repair pathway reduced the number of steps by 13 (74 to 61) and saved 56 minutes of total staff time per repair, resulting in annual efficiency savings of £3469.44. Turnaround time for the repaired kit decreased by 14 days and 29 days for the digital ad-hoc and digital MES pathways, respectively. Elective operations cancelled due to equipment issues decreased by 44%, from 1.5 operations/month pre-pilot to 0.83 operations/month post-pilot. Planned preventative maintenance compliance across the MES pathway increased by 67% (33% to 100%). Staff satisfaction with the repair pathway improved from 12% to 96%. Conclusion This pilot study showcases the numerous benefits that can be achieved through digitisation and offers an innovative case study to approach avoidable cancellations due to equipment failure.
Keywords: digital health; equipment maintainance; hospital management; instrument repairs; sterilization; surgical instrument; theatre efficiency; theatre productivity.
Copyright © 2024, Buddhdev et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: This pilot project was funded by B. Braun Medical Ltd. Financial relationships: Dr Heer Shah declare(s) employment from MediShout LTD. Dr Heer Shah is an employee of MediShout LTD. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures
References
-
- Negative impact of waiting time for primary total knee arthroplasty on satisfaction and patient-reported outcome. Lizaur-Utrilla A, Martinez-Mendez D, Miralles-Muñoz FA, Marco-Gomez L, Lopez-Prats FA. Int Orthop. 2016;40:2303–2307. - PubMed
-
- Impacts of elective surgical cancellations and postponements in Canada. Sommer JL, Jacobsohn E, El-Gabalawy R. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01824-z. Can J Anaesth. 2021;68:315–323. - PMC - PubMed
-
- The impact of waiting time on health gains from surgery: evidence from a national patient- reported outcome dataset. Nikolova S, Harrison M, Sutton M. Health Econ. 2016;25:955–968. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous