Novel Predictive Scoring System for Bone Union Rate After Conservative Management of Lumbar Spondylolysis
- PMID: 38975790
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005094
Novel Predictive Scoring System for Bone Union Rate After Conservative Management of Lumbar Spondylolysis
Abstract
Study design: A single-center retrospective cohort study.
Objectives: To develop a predictive scoring system for bone union after conservative treatment of lumbar spondylolysis and assess its internal validity.
Summary of background data: Lumbar spondylolysis, a common stress fracture in young athletes, is typically treated conservatively. Predicting bone union rates remains a challenge.
Methods: This study included patients aged 18 years or younger with lumbar spondylolysis undergoing conservative treatment. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to develop a scoring system containing 6 factors: sex, age, lesion level, main side stage of the lesion, contralateral side stage of the lesion, and spina bifida occulta. The predictive scoring system was internally validated from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve using bootstrap methods.
Results: The final analysis included 301 patients with 416 lesions, with an overall bone union rate of 80%. On multivariable analysis, the main and contralateral stages were identified as factors associated with bone union. The predictive scoring system was developed from the main side stage score (prelysis, early=0, progressive stage=1) and the contralateral side stage score (none=0, prelysis, early, progressive stage=1, terminal stage=3). The area under the curve was 0.855 (95% confidence interval, 0.811-0.896) for the ROC curve, showing good internal validity. The predicted bone union rates were generally consistent with the actual rates.
Conclusions: A simple predictive scoring system was developed for bone union after conservative treatment of lumbar spondylolysis, based on the stage of the lesion on the main and contralateral sides. The predicted bone union rate was ~90% for a total score of 0-1 and ≤30% for a score of 3-4. This system demonstrated good internal validity, suggesting its potential as a useful tool in clinical decision-making for the management of spondylolysis.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Choi JH, Ochoa JK, Lubinus A, et al. Management of lumbar spondylolysis in the adolescent athlete: a review of over 200 cases. Spine. 2022;22:1628–1633.
-
- Sairyo K, Katoh S, Takata Y, et al. MRI signal changes of the pedicle as an indicator for early diagnosis of spondylolysis in children and adolescents: a clinical and biomechanical study. Spine. 2006;31:206–211.
-
- Chung CC, Shimer AL. Lumbosacral spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Clin Sports Med. 2021;40:471–490.
-
- Linton AA, Hsu WK. A review of treatment for acute and chronic pars fractures in the lumbar spine. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2022;15:259–271.
-
- Sakai T, Tezuka F, Yamashita K, et al. Conservative treatment for bony healing in pediatric lumbar spondylolysis. Spine. 2017;42:E716–E720.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials