Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2420695.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.20695.

A Hospice Transitions Program for Patients in the Emergency Department

Affiliations

A Hospice Transitions Program for Patients in the Emergency Department

Christopher W Baugh et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Patients often visit the emergency department (ED) near the end of life. Their common disposition is inpatient hospital admission, which can result in a delayed transition to hospice care and, ultimately, an inpatient hospital death that may be misaligned with their goals of care.

Objective: To assess the association of hospice use with a novel multidisciplinary hospice program to rapidly identify and enroll eligible patients presenting to the ED near end of life.

Design, setting, and participants: This pre-post quality improvement study of a novel, multifaceted care transitions program involving a formalized pathway with email alerts, clinician training, hospice vendor expansion, metric creation, and data tracking was conducted at a large, urban tertiary care academic medical center affiliated with a comprehensive cancer center among adult patients presenting to the ED near the end of life. The control period before program launch was from September 1, 2018, to January 31, 2020, and the intervention period after program launch was from August 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022.

Main outcome and measures: The primary outcome was a transition to hospice without hospital admission and/or hospice admission within 96 hours of the ED visit. Secondary outcomes included length of stay and in-hospital mortality.

Results: This study included 270 patients (median age, 74.0 years [IQR, 62.0-85.0 years]; 133 of 270 women [49.3%]) in the control period, and 388 patients (median age, 73.0 years [IQR, 60.0-84.0 years]; 208 of 388 women [53.6%]) in the intervention period, identified as eligible for hospice transition within 96 hours of ED arrival. In the control period, 61 patients (22.6%) achieved the primary outcome compared with 210 patients (54.1%) in the intervention period (P < .001). The intervention was associated with the primary outcome after adjustment for age, race and ethnicity, primary payer, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and presence of a Medical Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) (adjusted odds ratio, 5.02; 95% CI, 3.17-7.94). In addition, the presence of a MOLST was independently associated with hospice transition across all groups (adjusted odds ratio, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.18-2.99). There was no significant difference between the control and intervention periods in inpatient length of stay (median, 2.0 days [IQR, 1.1-3.0 days] vs 1.9 days [IQR, 1.1-3.0 days]; P = .84), but in-hospital mortality was lower in the intervention period (48.5% [188 of 388] vs 64.4% [174 of 270]; P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: In this quality improvement study, a multidisciplinary program to facilitate ED patient transitions was associated with hospice use. Further investigation is needed to examine the generalizability and sustainability of the program.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Aizer reported receiving grants from Varian and NH TherAguix and personal fees from Seagen and Novartis outside the submitted work. Dr Leiter reported receiving royalties from UpToDate for a chapter on ethical considerations for pain management in end-of-life care outside the submitted work. Dr Molyneaux reported serving on the clinical trial scientific advisory board for Biogen outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Patient Cohort Selection
aExcluded if the patient’s goals were inconsistent with hospice care based on electronic health record review; specific criteria included inpatient admission for surgery, procedure, radiation therapy, or aggressive resuscitative measure (such as endotracheal intubation, vasopressor therapy, central line placement, or noninvasive positive pressure ventilation). bEligible but not enrolled in hospice pathway if there was an inpatient hospital admission followed by death within 96 hours without the use of hospice, despite an intention to transition to end-of-life care and comfort-focused care without intensive life-sustaining treatments.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Emergency Department (ED) Care Transitions Program Key Elements

References

    1. Hurley SL, Colling C, Bender L, et al. . Increasing inpatient hospice use versus patient preferences in the USA: are patients able to die in the setting of their choice? BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017;7(1):46-52. doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000599 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Society of Clinical Oncology. QOPI certification program standards. Accessed May 22, 2024. https://society.asco.org/sites/new-www.asco.org/files/content-files/prac...
    1. Harrison KL, Cenzer I, Ankuda CK, Hunt LJ, Aldridge MD. Hospice improves care quality for older adults with dementia in their last month of life. Health Aff (Millwood). 2022;41(6):821-830. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01985 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharafi S, Ziaee A, Dahmardeh H. What are the outcomes of hospice care for cancer patients? a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2022;31(1):64. doi:10.1007/s00520-022-07524-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shrank WH, Russell K, Emanuel EJ. Hospice carve-in-aligning benefits with patient and family needs. JAMA. 2020;324(1):35-36. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.8459 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms