Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 8;19(7):e0305655.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305655. eCollection 2024.

Digital divide and the health of internal elderly migrants in China: A cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Digital divide and the health of internal elderly migrants in China: A cross-sectional study

Yuping Liu et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: Population aging and internal migration have become the "norm" in China's population development. Influenced by both "mobility" and "old age," internal elderly migrants (IEMs) face the second-level digital divide problems primarily characterized by digital technology usage gap, which can lead to adverse health outcomes. Understanding the impact of the digital divide on the health of IEMs can provide effective solutions to meet the health needs of this particular group and facilitate their better integration into a digital society. Therefore, this study aims at exploring the impact of the digital divide on the health of IEMs, and identifying priorities and recommendations for improving IEMs' health by mitigating the adverse effects of the digital divide.

Methods: In the 2017 China Migrant Dynamic Survey (CMDS), a cross‑sectional sample of 169,989 internal migrants in 32 provincial units across China was recruited by stratified probability proportionate to size sampling (PPS). We focus on IEMs and require interviewees to be 60 years and older. Therefore, we excluded samples younger than 60 years of age and retained only 6,478 valid samples. Subsequently, STATA 17.0 software was applied to analyze the data. Based on the research objective and Grossman's model of health demand, we empirically tested using ordered logit regression.

Results: The digital divide does affect the health of IEMs in general and its negative effects tend to decrease significantly with age. In terms of groups, its impact showed noticeable group differences in residence arrangement, public health services and medical insurance coverage. Compared with IEMs who live alone or only live with their spouse, have not received public health service, and have not been covered by any medical insurance, the digital divide imposes a smaller adverse impact on the health of IEMs who live with at least one offspring, have received public health service, and have covered in at least one medical insurance. In terms of potential mechanisms, among the effects of digital divide on the health of IEMs, the mediating effect of urban integration is not significant, the social interaction has only a partial mediating effect, and the medical convenience has a significant mediating effect.

Conclusion: Our findings confirm the existence of the third-level digital divide among IEMs concerning health, that is, the digital divide has adverse health outcomes for this group, and underscore the important implications of reducing the negative impact of the digital divide in improving the health status of IEMs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Mechanisms of the impact of digital technology usage ability on the health of IEMs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Evandrou M, Falkingham J, Green M. Migration in later life: evidence from the British household panel study. Population Trends. 2010;141(1):77–94. doi: 10.1057/pt.2010.22 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pan JH, Yang YF. Research on resilience governance of digital poverty among the elderly. Scientific Research on Aging. 2020;8(2):52–60. 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5898.2020.02.006. - DOI
    1. Seifert A, Hofer M, Rössel Jörg. Older adults’ perceived sense of social exclusion from the digital world. Educational Gerontology. 2018;44(12):775–785. 10.1080/03601277.2019.1574415. - DOI
    1. Van Dijk J, Hacker K. The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society. 2003;19(4):315–326. 10.1080/01972240309487. - DOI
    1. Mehra B, Merkel C, Bishop AP. The internet for empowerment of minority and marginalized users. New Media & Society. 2004;6(6):781–802. 10.1177/146144804047513. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources