How I treat acute myeloid leukemia with differentiation therapy
- PMID: 38976876
- PMCID: PMC11952016
- DOI: 10.1182/blood.2024024008
How I treat acute myeloid leukemia with differentiation therapy
Abstract
An increasing number of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapeutics have been developed, not as cytotoxic therapies but rather as targeted agents able to restore the aberrant and leukemogenic "block" in normal differentiation. All-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide are classic examples of differentiating agents for treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL); newer therapies functioning through differentiation include isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 inhibitors, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitors, and menin inhibitors. The terminal differentiation of leukemic blasts via differentiating-agent therapy can lead to a constellation of signs and symptoms, originally referred to as "retinoic acid syndrome" and now termed "differentiation syndrome" (DS), characterized predominantly by systemic inflammatory response system-like features of dyspnea, pulmonary infiltrates, pleural and pericardial effusions, unexplained fevers, hypotension, edema, and renal insufficiency. DS in patients with newly diagnosed APL is generally straightforward to identify; however, DS in patients with multiply relapsed AML can be more challenging to diagnose, due to nonspecific signs and symptoms that can be mistakenly attributed to infectious etiologies or the underlying refractory leukemia itself. Prompt consideration of DS, rapid initiation of systemic corticosteroids, and early cytoreduction in the setting of concomitant hyperleukocytosis are essential for optimal management.
© 2025 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: G.C.I. reports research funding from Celgene, Merck, Kura Oncology, Syndax, Astex, and Novartis; and received consultancy or advisory board fees from NuProbe, AbbVie, Novartis, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Syndax, and Kura Oncology. E.M.S. reports grants from Eisai and Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS); consulting fees from Novartis, PinotBio, Janssen, BMS, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Menarini, Genentech, Genesis, AbbVie, Neoleukin Corporation, Gilead Sciences Inc, Syndax Pharmaceuticals Inc, OnCusp Therapeutics, CTI BioPharma, Foghorn Therapeutics, Servier Laboratories, Calithera Biosciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Aptose Biosciences, Syros, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Astellas Pharma, Ono Pharma, and Blueprint Medicines; and participation in advisory boards for Epizyme Inc and Cellectis. C.D.D. reports research funding from AbbVie, Astex, Immune-Onc, BMS, Cleave, Foghorn, Loxo, Rigel, and Servier; consulting fees from Amgen, AbbVie, Astellas, BMS, Genmab, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, Jazz, Schrodinger, Servier, and Stemline Therapeutics; honoraria for educational events from AbbVie, Astellas, BMS, Jazz, and Servier; meeting support from Servier; and has participated on a Genmab data safety board.
References
-
- DiNardo CD, Wei AH. How I treat acute myeloid leukemia in the era of new drugs. Blood. 2020;135(2):85–96. - PubMed
-
- Perl AE, Martinelli G, Cortes JE, et al. Gilteritinib or chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutated AML. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(18):1728–1740. - PubMed
-
- DiNardo CD, Stein EM, de Botton S, et al. Durable remissions with ivosidenib in IDH1-mutated relapsed or refractory AML. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(25):2386–2398. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous