Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul;19(4):e12629.
doi: 10.1111/opn.12629.

Development of an Instrument to Assess Health and Social Care Professionals' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Later-Life Intimacy and Sexuality (HSCP-KALLIS): A Delphi Study

Yung-Hui Chen  1 , Cindy Jones  1   2 , Amy Bannatyne  1 , Maria Horne  3
Affiliations

Development of an Instrument to Assess Health and Social Care Professionals' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Later-Life Intimacy and Sexuality (HSCP-KALLIS): A Delphi Study

Yung-Hui Chen et al. Int J Older People Nurs. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Aims: We aimed to ascertain the content validity of an instrument to assess health and social care professionals' knowledge and attitudes towards later-life intimacy and sexuality (HSCP-KALLIS).

Background: For older adults, intimacy and sexuality are important in maintaining their quality of life and well-being. However, addressing these needs remains challenging for health and social care professionals, particularly for nursing staff providing 24-h direct care to older people with dementia or those identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex or queer/questioning individuals. Existing instruments assessing knowledge and attitudes towards later-life intimacy and sexuality are dated and fail to adequately address dementia and sexual diversity.

Design: A two-round modified Delphi study was conducted.

Methods: Initially, 79 knowledge and attitude items were generated through an integrative review. Panellists rated each item's clarity and importance using online questionnaires. The content validity index for the individual and overall items was calculated. The panellists' written feedback-along with their knowledge level of later-life intimacy and sexuality-was obtained.

Results: Panellists included health and social care professionals (n = 9); healthcare-related educators (n = 2); researchers specialising in later-life intimacy, sexuality, dementia care and sexual diversity support (n = 7); and family carers of older people with dementia (n = 2). The instrument was revised based on the feedback received. The components of dementia, LGBTIQ+ and the provision of sex worker services in healthcare settings were highlighted by the panellists. Notably, 46 knowledge and 40 attitude items fulfilled the consensus criteria for clarity and importance.

Conclusions: Acceptable content validity was established for the knowledge and attitude items. Further research is required to establish the psychometric properties of the HSCP-KALLIS. This instrument has implications for clinical practice-specifically, in nursing care-by addressing issues to improve awareness regarding later-life intimacy and sexuality in healthcare settings.

Implications for practice: The HSCP-KALLIS has the potential to inform the educational needs regarding knowledge and attitudes towards later-life intimacy and sexuality for health and social care professionals, specifically nursing staff. The findings of the HSCP-KALLIS can be used for the development of competencies for later-life intimacy and sexuality, establishing policies and guidelines to support older adults' intimacy and sexuality needs in health care settings.

Keywords: content validity; dementia; intimacy; older people; sex worker services; sexual diversity; sexuality.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Annerstedt, C. F., and S. Glasdam. 2019. “Nurses' Attitudes Towards Support for and Communication About Sexual Health—A Qualitative Study From the Perspectives of Oncological Nurses.” Journal of Clinical Nursing 28, no. 19–20: 3556–3566. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14949.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2021. Profile of Australia's Population. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias‐welfare/profile‐of‐australias....
    1. Avella, J. R. 2016. “Delphi Panels: Research Design, Procedures, Advantages, and Challenges.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 11: 305–321. http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3561.
    1. Bonache, H., N. Delgado, A. Pina, and J. A. Hernández‐Cabrera. 2021. “Prostitution Policies and Attitudes Toward Prostitutes.” Archives of Sexual Behaviour 50, no. 5: 1991–2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508‐020‐01891‐9.
    1. Bloom, B. S. 1968. “Learning for Mastery. Instruction and Curriculum. Regional Education Laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, Topical Papers and Reprints, Number 1.” Evaluation Comment 1, no. 2: n2. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED053419.pdf.

LinkOut - more resources