Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 8;10(4):00039-2024.
doi: 10.1183/23120541.00039-2024. eCollection 2024 Jul.

Unmet need in pulmonary hypertension-associated interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD): a clinician survey of real-world management of PH-ILD in Europe

Affiliations

Unmet need in pulmonary hypertension-associated interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD): a clinician survey of real-world management of PH-ILD in Europe

David Montani et al. ERJ Open Res. .

Abstract

Background: With no approved therapies for pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD) in Europe, we surveyed clinician perceptions on PH-ILD management and unmet need to understand current real-world practices.

Methods: An online clinician survey on PH-ILD management was conducted in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK.

Results: 55 clinicians (78% pulmonologists), each managing a median 20 PH-ILD patients (interquartile range (IQR) 10-50), participated. Upon PH suspicion, clinicians referred a median 50% (IQR 20-73%) of patients for echocardiography alone and 35% (IQR 20-78%) for echocardiography, followed by right heart catheterisation. Upon diagnosis, a median 20% (IQR 9-30%), 40% (IQR 20-50%) and 35% (IQR 20-55%) of patients fell under the pulmonary arterial pressure ranges of 21-24 mmHg, 25-34 mmHg and >35 mmHg, respectively. 50% of patients received off-label treatment for their PH and, of those, off-label phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE-5i), endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) and prostacyclin analogues were prescribed first-line by 78%, 9% and 7% of clinicians, respectively. Upon PDE-5i non-response, 35% of clinicians proceed with an ERA, 35% with no further therapy. 55% of clinicians used dual-therapy. Yearly median inpatient admissions and emergency visits were 2.0 (IQR 1.3-2.9) and 1.5 (IQR 1.0-2.0), respectively (n=31 responses). Most clinicians (69%) highlighted lack of efficacy or evidence for current therapies as a key gap in PH-ILD management.

Conclusions: This study gives insight into real-world European PH-ILD diagnosis and management. With significant use of off-label treatment, there is a large unmet need due to lack of approved therapies. Despite updated guidelines, more evidence is needed to standardise PH-ILD management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: S. Ghio, H. Nunes, J.M. Cifrián, R.P. Rojo and A. Guenther report no conflict of interest. D. Montani reports receiving grants and personal fees from Actelion, Bayer, GSK, Pfizer, MSD, Chiesi, Boehringer and Acceleron. F. Meloni reports having participated in advisory boards for Zambon and Boehringer. J. Cannon reports having received honorarium for attending and speaking at Janssen and Ferrer advisory boards and international conferences. L. Howard reports having received honoraria from Ferrer. H.G. García, M.F. Delgado and G.B. Jeanneret are employed by Ferrer Pharma Ltd.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Diagnostic procedures carried out by clinicians to confirm PH in ILD patients suspected to have PH (n=55). EU5: European five countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK); ILD: interstitial lung disease; PH: pulmonary hypertension; RHC: right heart catheterisation.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Distribution of a) clinician prescription of ILD drugs in PH-ILD patients and b) clinician-reported PH-ILD patient receipt of ILD therapies (n=16–55#). “Others” consists of cyclophosphamide and immunoglobulins. ILD: interstitial lung disease; PH-ILD: pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease; TNF: tumour necrosis factor. #: the four clinicians that stated that ILD treatment was not known were not followed with the questions in b; only those that stated that a given ILD drug was being used in their patients in a were given the follow-up question for the specific drug in b.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Off-label PAH treatment frequency in PH-ILD patients managed by clinicians (n=53#). Each circle represents one clinician's answer; bar represents the mean value. PAH: group 1 pulmonary hypertension; PH-ILD: pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease; EU5: European five countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK). #: two clinicians did not answer this question.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Off-label PAH monotherapy frequency in PH-ILD patients managed by clinicians (n=55). Each circle represents one clinician's answer; bar represents the mean value. PDE-5: phosphodiesterase-5; PAH: group 1 pulmonary hypertension; PH-ILD: pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease; sGC: soluble guanyl cyclase.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Clinician-selected prognostic factors at diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH) for a positive response to off-label PAH therapy in PH-ILD patients (n=55). ILD: interstitial lung disease; PAH: group 1 pulmonary hypertension.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Median clinician-reported lung transplantation rates for their PH-ILD patients (n=55). PH-CTD-ILD: pulmonary hypertension associated with connective tissue disease-based interstitial lung disease; PH-ILD: pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease; PH-IPF: pulmonary hypertension associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

References

    1. Humbert M, Kovacs G, Hoeper MM, et al. . 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2023; 61: 2200879. doi:10.1183/13993003.00879-2022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wijeratne DT, Lajkosz K, Brogly SB, et al. . Increasing incidence and prevalence of World Health Organization groups 1 to 4 pulmonary hypertension: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2018; 11: e003973. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003973 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaul B, Cottin V, Collard HR, et al. . Variability in global prevalence of interstitial lung disease. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8: 751181. doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.751181 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schwarzkopf L, Witt S, Waelscher J, et al. . Associations between comorbidities, their treatment and survival in patients with interstitial lung diseases: a claims data analysis. Respir Res 2018; 19: 73. doi:10.1186/s12931-018-0769-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pedraza-Serrano F, Jiménez-García R, López-de-Andrés A, et al. . Characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized with interstitial lung diseases in Spain, 2014 to 2015. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98: e15779. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000015779 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources