Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 24:15:1396720.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1396720. eCollection 2024.

N6-methyladenosine methylation analysis of circRNAs in acquired middle ear cholesteatoma

Affiliations

N6-methyladenosine methylation analysis of circRNAs in acquired middle ear cholesteatoma

Jun He et al. Front Genet. .

Abstract

Introduction: Middle ear cholesteatoma is a chronic middle ear disease characterized by severe hearing loss and adjacent bone erosion, resulting in numerous complications. This study sought to identify pathways involved in N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification of circRNA in middle ear cholesteatoma.

Methods: A m6A circRNA epitranscriptomic microarray analysis was performed in middle ear cholesteatoma tissues (n = 5) and normal post-auricular skin samples (n = 5). Bioinformatics analyses subsequently explored the biological functions (Gene Ontology, GO) and signaling pathways (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, KEGG) underlying middle ear cholesteatoma pathogenesis. Methylated RNA immunoprecipitation qPCR (MeRIP-qPCR) was performed to verify the presence of circRNAs with m6A modifications in middle ear cholesteatoma and normal skin samples.

Results: Microarray analysis identified 3,755 circRNAs as significantly differentially modified by m6A methylation in middle ear cholesteatoma compared with the normal post-auricular skin. Among these, 3,742 were hypermethylated (FC ≥ 2, FDR < 0.05) and 13 were hypomethylated (FC ≤ 1/2, FDR < 0.05). GO analysis terms with the highest enrichment score were localization, cytoplasm, and ATP-dependent activity for biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions respectively. Of the eight hypermethylated circRNA pathways, RNA degradation pathway has the highest enrichment score. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR) signaling pathway was hypomethylated. To validate the microarray analysis, we conducted MeRIP-qPCR to assess the methylation levels of five specific m6A-modified circRNAs: hsa_circRNA_061554, hsa_circRNA_001454, hsa_circRNA_031526, hsa_circRNA_100833, and hsa_circRNA_022382. The validation was highly consistent with the findings from the microarray analysis.

Conclusion: Our study firstly presents m6A modification patterns of circRNAs in middle ear cholesteatoma. This finding suggests a direction for circRNA m6A modification research in the etiology of cholesteatoma and provides potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of middle ear cholesteatoma.

Keywords: circRNA-miRNA-mRNA network; circular RNAs (circRNAs); m6A modification; microarray analysis; middle ear cholesteatoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Expression profiles of significantly altered circRNAs in middle ear cholesteatoma (C) and normal skin (S). (A) The heatmap reveals distinct circRNA methylation patterns between middle ear cholesteatoma and normal skin. The red and blue lines represent middle ear cholesteatoma (C) and normal skin (S), respectively. Each group includes five samples. (B) CircRNAs differentially modified by m6A methylation in middle ear cholesteatoma and normal post-auricular skin, according to the volcano diagram analysis. The red and blue dots represent significantly hyper- and hypomethylated circRNAs (fold change ≥2 or 1/2, FDR < 0.05).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
GO analysis of circRNAs differentially modified by m6A methylation. (A) Top 10 significantly differentially modified circRNA-enriched GO items. (B) Biological process. (C) Cellular component. (D) Molecular function.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Pathway analysis based on the KEGG was conducted to explore the functional implications of circRNAs differentially modified by m6A methylation. (A,B) highlight pathways enriched with significantly hypermethylated circRNAs, while (C,D) depict the pathway enriched with significantly hypomethylated circRNAs.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
m6A methylation levels of circRNAs verified by MeRIP-qPCR. We selected five differentially modified circRNAs with m6A methylation. Hsa_circRNA_061554, hsa_circRNA_001454, and hsa_circRNA_031526 were significantly hypermethylated in cholesteatoma, while the m6A methylation levels of hsa_circRNA_100833 and hsa_circRNA_022382 were significantly downregulated. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ***p < 0.001, unpaired t-test.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
According to the ceRNA hypothesis, a network consisting of circRNA-miRNA-mRNA was established. This network is built upon five validated m6A-modified circRNAs. In the network, microRNAs, protein coding RNAs, noncoding RNAs, and circRNAs are represented by nodes colored in red, light blue, light green, and brown respectively. Directed relationships are depicted by edges with a T-shaped arrow, while undirected relationships are shown by edges without arrows.

Similar articles

References

    1. An Y., Duan H. (2022). The role of m6A RNA methylation in cancer metabolism. Mol. Cancer 21 (1), 14. 10.1186/s12943-022-01500-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atanasov A. G., Blunder M., Fakhrudin N., Liu X., Noha S. M., Malainer C., et al. (2013). Polyacetylenes from Notopterygium incisum--new selective partial agonists of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma. PLoS One 8 (4), e61755. 10.1371/journal.pone.0061755 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azatyan A., Zhang S., Darabi A., Siesjö P., Wang T., Zaphiropoulos P. G. (2021). Circular RNAs in hedgehog signaling activation and hedgehog-mediated medulloblastoma tumors. Cancers (Basel) 13 (20), 5138. 10.3390/cancers13205138 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berger J., Moller D. E. (2002). The mechanisms of action of PPARs. Annu. Rev. Med. 53, 409–435. 10.1146/annurev.med.53.082901.104018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castle J. T. (2018). Cholesteatoma pearls: practical points and update. Head. Neck Pathol. 12 (3), 419–429. 10.1007/s12105-018-0915-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources