Racial Differences in Stigmatizing and Positive Language in Emergency Medicine Notes
- PMID: 38980524
- DOI: 10.1007/s40615-024-02080-3
Racial Differences in Stigmatizing and Positive Language in Emergency Medicine Notes
Abstract
Objective: Language used by providers in medical documentation may reveal evidence of race-related implicit bias. We aimed to use natural language processing (NLP) to examine if prevalence of stigmatizing language in emergency medicine (EM) encounter notes differs across patient race/ethnicity.
Methods: In a retrospective cohort of EM encounters, NLP techniques identified stigmatizing and positive themes. Logistic regression models analyzed the association of race/ethnicity and themes within notes. Outcomes were the presence (or absence) of 7 different themes: 5 stigmatizing (difficult, non-compliant, skepticism, substance abuse/seeking, and financial difficulty) and 2 positive (compliment and compliant).
Results: The sample included notes from 26,363 unique patients. NH Black patient notes were less likely to contain difficult (odds ratio (OR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73-0.88), skepticism (OR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.79-0.96), and substance abuse/seeking (OR 0.62, 95% CI, 0.56-0.70) compared to NH White patient notes but more likely to contain non-compliant (OR 1.26, 95% CI, 1.17-1.36) and financial difficulty (OR 1.14, 95% CI, 1.04-1.25). Hispanic patient notes were less likely to contain difficult (OR 0.68, 95% CI, 0.58-0.80) and substance abuse/seeking (OR 0.78, 95% CI, 0.66-0.93). NH NA/AI patient notes had twice the odds as NH White patient notes to contain a stigmatizing theme (OR 2.02, 95% CI, 1.64-2.49).
Conclusions: Using an NLP model to analyze themes in EM notes across racial groups, we identified several inequities in the usage of positive and stigmatizing language. Interventions to minimize race-related implicit bias should be undertaken.
Keywords: Emergency medicine; Health inequities; Medical documentation; Natural language processing.
© 2024. W. Montague Cobb-NMA Health Institute.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics Approval: This study was determined to be exempt from review by the Allina Health Institutional Review Board. Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Macias-Konstantopoulos WL, Collins KA, Diaz R, Duber HC, Edwards CD, Hsu AP, Ranney ML, Riviello RJ, Wettstein ZS, Sachs CJ. Race, healthcare, and health disparities: a critical review and recommendations for advancing health equity. West J Emerg Med. 2023;24:906–18. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.58408 . - PubMed - PMC
-
- White AA, Chanoff D. Seeing patients unconscious bias in health care. Harvard University Press; 2011.
-
- Zestcott CA, Blair IV, Stone J. Examining the presence, consequences, and reduction of implicit bias in health care: a narrative review. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2016;19:528–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216642029 . - PubMed - PMC
-
- Clark US, Hurd YL. Addressing racism and disparities in the biomedical sciences. Nat Hum Behav. 2020;4:774–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0917-7 . - PubMed