Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chinese Patients with Locally Advanced or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer After Pelvic Exenteration
- PMID: 38980585
- DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15722-x
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chinese Patients with Locally Advanced or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer After Pelvic Exenteration
Abstract
Background: Pelvic exenteration (PE) is often the only curative treatment option for selected locally advanced and locally recurrent colorectal cancer associated with significant morbidity. Open and laparoscopic approaches were accepted for this procedure.
Objective: This study aimed to examine the Chinese patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after PE.
Methods: A total of 122 enrolled participants were asked to complete PROs at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after PE. PROs included seven symptoms from the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). The HRQoL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C).
Results: The overall postoperative complication rate was 41.0%. Patients experienced lower physical and functional well-being and FACT-C 1 month after surgery, then gradually recovered. The FACT-C score returned to baseline 9 months after surgery. Social and emotional well-being did not show signs of recovery until 6 months after the surgical procedure, and did not fully return to baseline until 12 months post-surgery. Symptom rates of insomnia, anxiety, discouragement, and sadness (composite score >0) did not improve significantly from baseline until 12 months after surgery.
Conclusions: PE is a feasible treatment choice for locally advanced primary and recurrent colorectal cancer. Social, psychological, and emotional recovery in the Chinese population after PE tends to be slower compared with the physical condition.
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; FACT-C; Patient-reported outcomes; Pelvic exenteration; Quality of life.
© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.
References
-
- Winter DC, Walsh R, Lee G, Kiely D, O’Riordain MG, O’Sullivan GC. Local involvement of the urinary bladder in primary colorectal cancer: outcome with en bloc resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;2:441–6. - DOI
-
- Rahbari NN, Ulrich AB, Bruckner T, et al. Surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer in the era of total mesorectal excision: Is there still a chance for cure? Ann Surg. 2011;3:522–33. - DOI
-
- Brunschwig A. Complete excision of pelvic viscera for advanced carcinoma; a one-stage abdominoperineal operation with end colostomy and bilateral ureteral implantation into the colon above the colostomy. Cancer. 1948;2:177–83. - DOI
-
- Platt E, Dovell G, Smolarek S. Systematic review of outcomes following pelvic exenteration for the treatment of primary and recurrent locally advanced rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2018;11:835–45. - DOI
-
- Harji DP, Griffiths B, Velikova G, Sagar PM, Brown J. Systematic review of health-related quality of life in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;8:1132–45. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous