Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep 1;327(3):C661-C670.
doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00327.2024. Epub 2024 Jul 9.

Involvement of the gut microbiota in cancer cachexia

Affiliations
Review

Involvement of the gut microbiota in cancer cachexia

Brandon N VanderVeen et al. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. .

Abstract

Cancer cachexia, or the unintentional loss of body weight in patients with cancer, is a multiorgan and multifactorial syndrome with a complex and largely unknown etiology; however, metabolic dysfunction and inflammation remain hallmarks of cancer-associated wasting. Although cachexia manifests with muscle and adipose tissue loss, perturbations to the gastrointestinal tract may serve as the frontline for both impaired nutrient absorption and immune-activating gut dysbiosis. Investigations into the gut microbiota have exploded within the past two decades, demonstrating multiple gut-tissue axes; however, the link between adipose and skeletal muscle wasting and the gut microbiota with cancer is only beginning to be understood. Furthermore, the most used anticancer drugs (e.g. chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors) negatively impact gut homeostasis, potentially exacerbating wasting and contributing to poor patient outcomes and survival. In this review, we 1) highlight our current understanding of the microbial changes that occur with cachexia, 2) discuss how microbial changes may contribute to adipose and skeletal muscle wasting, and 3) outline study design considerations needed when examining the role of the microbiota in cancer-induced cachexia.

Keywords: Bifidobacterium; Lactobacillus; inflammation; microbiome; wasting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Working model of how gut microbes contribute to muscle and adipose tissue wasting with cachexia. The gastrointestinal mucosa plays a vital role not only in housing the gut microbiome but also in protecting the intestinal epithelium and shielding immune cells in the lamina propria (LP) from inappropriate activation. Dendritic cells sample luminal antigens and present to immune cells in the LP for activation (e.g., monocytes, neutrophils, and T-cells). Once activated, these cells can either extravasate or they can produce inflammatory cytokines (i.e., IL-6, TNF-α, and GDF15), which ultimately enter circulation and induce muscle and adipose tissue wasting. Resident immune cells (e.g., macrophages) can also be activated by invading microbes and/or pathogens (dysbiosis), causing the release of similar cytokines, which can further perpetuate cachexia. In addition, microbes (e.g., Firmicutes) can produce short-chain fatty acids and other metabolites, which can combat cachexia and are seen to be reduced in cachectic patients. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Microbial changes are seen at different taxonomic levels with cachexia. A summary of the available literature on microbial changes in both murine and human studies occurring in cancer-induced cachexia include 1) changes to α- and/or β-diversity and 2) increases or decreases in specific microbes at various taxonomic levels (i.e., phylum, family, genus, and species levels). Pink indicates data are supported in murine models. Blue indicates data are supported in human models. Green indicates data are supported in both mice and humans. *changes have been correlated to loss of muscle mass; †changes have been correlated to adipose tissue loss. Created with BioRender.com.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, Jatoi A, Loprinzi C, MacDonald N, Mantovani G, Davis M, Muscaritoli M, Ottery F, Radbruch L, Ravasco P, Walsh D, Wilcock A, Kaasa S, Baracos VE. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol 12: 489–495, 2011. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anker MS, Holcomb R, Muscaritoli M, von Haehling S, Haverkamp W, Jatoi A, Morley JE, Strasser F, Landmesser U, Coats AJS, Anker SD. Orphan disease status of cancer cachexia in the USA and in the European Union: a systematic review. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 10: 22–34, 2019. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12402. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pryce BR, Wang DJ, Zimmers TA, Ostrowski MC, Guttridge DC. Cancer cachexia: involvement of an expanding macroenvironment. Cancer Cell 41: 581–584, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.02.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bindels LB, Neyrinck AM, Loumaye A, Catry E, Walgrave H, Cherbuy C, Leclercq S, Van Hul M, Plovier H, Pachikian B, Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Langella P, Cani PD, Thissen JP, Delzenne NM. Increased gut permeability in cancer cachexia: mechanisms and clinical relevance. Oncotarget 9: 18224–18238, 2018. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24804. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ubachs J, Ziemons J, Soons Z, Aarnoutse R, van Dijk DPJ, Penders J, van Helvoort A, Smidt ML, Kruitwagen RFPM, Baade-Corpelijn L, Olde Damink SWM, Rensen SS. Gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acid alterations in cachectic cancer patients. JCSM 12: 2007–2021, 2021. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12804. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources