Hepatitis B screening in hematology patients receiving intravenous immunoglobulin
- PMID: 38982983
- DOI: 10.1111/trf.17938
Hepatitis B screening in hematology patients receiving intravenous immunoglobulin
Abstract
Background: Transient positivity for hepatitis B core antibody (Anti-HBc) following intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and subcutaneous immunoglobulin exposure is a well-described phenomenon. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review Hepatitis B viral screening practices in IVIG recipients in a hematology specific cohort at a single center.
Methods: Electronic databases were analyzed to identify all hematology patients who received IVIG from September 2022 to March 2022 at a single Irish center (n = 43). The proportion of patients that had a baseline anti-HBc tested prior to IVIG receipt was assessed as well as the proportion of patients that developed a transiently positive anti-HBc following IVIG exposure. Data were also collected relating to signal cut-off ratios in patients with detectable anti-HBc post-IVIG.
Results: 58.1% of patients had at least one serological hepatitis B viral test sent prior to IVIG exposure. Anti-HBc was the least common serological investigation performed prior to IVIG exposure (21% of recipients). A positive or equivocal "low level antibody" was identified in 15% of recipients and this was proven to be transient in all cases.
Conclusion: The minority of hematology patients had a baseline anti-HBc assessed prior to IVIG exposure. All patients in this study had the potential to require further immunosuppressive therapies, which could be limited by a misleading anti-HBc result. We therefore advocate for baseline anti-HBc testing to be performed prior to IVIG exposure in hematology patients and for cautious interpretation of anti-HBc results taking into account signal cut-off ratios post-IVIG exposure.
Keywords: infectious disease testing; intravenous immunoglobulin; transfusiontransmitted disease—hepatitis.
© 2024 The Author(s). Transfusion published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AABB.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Darabi K, Abdel‐Wahab O, Dzik WH. Current usage of intravenous immune globulin and the rationale behind it: the Massachusetts General Hospital data and a review of the literature. Transfusion. 2006 May;46(5):741–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00792.x
-
- Perez EE, Orange JS, Bonilla F, Chinen J, Chinn IK, Dorsey M, et al. Update on the use of immunoglobulin in human disease: a review of evidence. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(3):S1–S46.
-
- Radosevich M, Burnouf T. Intravenous immunoglobulin G: trends in production methods, quality control and quality assurance. Vox Sang. 2010 Jan;98(1):12–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01226.x
-
- Scientific discussion 1. Introduction—European Medicines Agency [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jan 8]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-discussion/kiovig-epar...
-
- Arnold DM, Crowther MA, Meyer RM, Carruthers J, DiTomasso J, Heddle NM, et al. Misleading hepatitis B test results due to intravenous immunoglobulin administration: implications for a clinical trial of rituximab in immune thrombocytopenia. Transfusion. 2010;50(12):2577–2581.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical