Comprehensive review of adverse reactions and toxicology in ASO-based therapies for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: From FDA-approved drugs to peptide-conjugated ASO
- PMID: 38983605
- PMCID: PMC11231654
- DOI: 10.1016/j.crtox.2024.100182
Comprehensive review of adverse reactions and toxicology in ASO-based therapies for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: From FDA-approved drugs to peptide-conjugated ASO
Abstract
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) is a devastating X-linked genetic disorder characterized by progressive muscle degeneration due to mutations in the dystrophin gene. This results in the absence or dysfunction of the dystrophin protein, leading to muscle weakness, loss of ambulation, respiratory issues, and cardiac complications, often leading to premature death. Recently, antisense oligonucleotide (ASO)-mediated exon skipping has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for DMD. Notably, the FDA has conditionally approved four ASO therapies for DMD, with numerous others in various stages of clinical development, indicating the growing interest and potential in this field. To enhance ASO-based therapies, researchers have explored the novel concept of conjugating peptides to the phosphorodiamidate morpholino backbone (PMO) of ASOs, leading to the development of peptide-conjugated PMOs (PPMOs). These PPMOs have demonstrated significantly improved pharmacokinetic profiles, potentially augmenting their therapeutic effectiveness. Despite the optimism surrounding ASOs and PPMOs, concerns persist regarding their efficacy and safety. To comprehensively evaluate these therapies, it is imperative to expand patient populations in clinical trials and conduct thorough investigations into the associated risks. This article provides a comprehensive review and discussion of the available data pertaining to adverse reactions and toxicology associated with FDA-approved ASO drugs for DMD. Furthermore, it offers insights into the emerging category of peptide-conjugated ASO drugs those are clinical and preclinical trials, shedding light on their potential benefits and challenges.
Keywords: Adverse rection; Casimersen; DMD; ENTR-601-44; Eteplirsen; Golodirsen; PGN-ED051; SRP-5051; Toxicity; Viltolarsen.
© 2024 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: T.Y. is a co-founder and shareholder of OligomicsTx Inc., which aims to commercialize antisense technology. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Aartsma-Rus A., Goemans N. A sequel to the eteplirsen saga: eteplirsen is approved in the united states but was not approved in Europe. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2019;29:13–15. - PubMed
-
- Aartsma-Rus A., van Deutekom J.C., Fokkema I.F., van Ommen G.J., den Dunnen J.T. Entries in the Leiden Duchenne muscular dystrophy mutation database: an overview of mutation types and paradoxical cases that confirm the reading-frame rule. Muscle Nerve. 2006;34:135–144. - PubMed
-
- Ahn A.H., Kunkel L.M. The structural and functional diversity of dystrophin. Nat. Genet. 1993;3:283–291. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
