Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun 25;4(5):46.
doi: 10.3892/mi.2024.170. eCollection 2024 Sep-Oct.

Myeloid‑derived suppressor cells as targets of emerging therapies and nanotherapies (Review)

Affiliations
Review

Myeloid‑derived suppressor cells as targets of emerging therapies and nanotherapies (Review)

Dileep Kumar et al. Med Int (Lond). .

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. Immunotherapies are a promising approach in cancer treatment, particularly for aggressive forms of BC with high mortality rates. However, the current eligibility for immunotherapy remains limited to a limited fraction of patients with BC. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), originating from myeloid cells, are known for their dual role in immunosuppression and tumor promotion, significantly affecting patient outcomes by fostering the formation of premetastatic niches. Consequently, targeting MDSCs has emerged as a promising avenue for further exploration in therapeutic interventions. Leveraging nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems, which excel in accumulating drugs within tumors via passive or active targeting mechanisms, are a promising strategy for the use of MDSCs in the treatment of BC. The present review discusses the immunosuppressive functions of MDSCs, their role in BC, and the diverse strategies for targeting them in cancer therapy. Additionally, the present review discusses future advancements in BC treatments focusing on MDSCs. Furthermore, it elucidates the mechanisms underlying MDSC activation, recruitment and differentiation in BC progression, highlighting the clinical characteristics that render MDSCs suitable candidates for the therapy and targeted nanotherapy of BC.

Keywords: breast cancer; immunosuppression; immunotherapy; myeloid-derived suppressor cells; nanotherapy; tumor microenvironment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mechanisms involved in the production, activation, recruitment and differentiation of MDSC in BC. MDSCs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells; HPCs, hematopoietic progenitor cells; SP1, specific protein 1; GM-CS, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; ALDH1A1, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1; TAK1, TGF-β-activated kinase 1; CS, chondroitin sulfate; CHPF, chondroitin polymerase factor; SMS2, sphingosine synthase 2; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; TAMs, tumor-associated macrophages; M1, M1 macrophages; M2, M2 macrophages.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Presence of MDSCs in BC and their diverse immunosuppressive effects (A) MDSCs suppress T-cells by activating IDO, resulting in the depletion of essential nutrients, such as ARG1, TRP and cysteine (CYS). (B) MDSCs induce oxidative stress by generating ROS, RNS and NO, leading to T-cell suppression. (C) MDSCs impede lymphocyte migration through direct physical contact and the expression of ADAM17. (D) MDSCs disrupt the conversion of naïve CD4+ T-cells into Tregs. MDSCs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells; PNT, peroxynitrite; TCR, T-cell receptor; IDO, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; ARG1, arginase 1; TRP, tryptophan; CYS, cysteine; ROS, reactive oxygen species; RNS, reactive nitrogen species; NO, nitric oxide; ADAM17, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain 17.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Key strategies for targeting MDSCs that can be exploited by nanotechnology independently or in conjunction with pharmaceutical agents. i) Depleting MDSC populations. ii) Preventing recruitment and migration of MDSCs to the tumor microenviroment. iii) Weakening immunosuppressive functions of MDSCs by lowering the expression of ARG1, inducible nitric oxide synthase, COX-2 and minimizing ROS generation. iv) Stimulating the differentiation of MDSCs into non-suppressive mature myeloid cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells. Illustrative examples are provided for each therapeutic tactic. MDSCs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells; ARG1, arginase 1; ROS, reactive oxygen species; NOx, NADPH oxidase enzyme; PGE2, prostaglandin E2.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lei S, Zheng R, Zhang S, Wang S, Chen R, Sun K, Zeng H, Zhou J, Wei W. Global patterns of breast cancer incidence and mortality: A population-based cancer registry data analysis from 2000 to 2020. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2021;41:1183–1194. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12207. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, Abraham J, Aft R, Agnese D, Allison KH, Anderson B, Burstein HJ, Chew H, Dang C, et al. Breast cancer, version 3.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022;20:691–722. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Partridge AH, Burstein HJ, Winer EP. Side effects of chemotherapy and combined chemohormonal therapy in women with early-stage breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001;(30):135–142. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a003451. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Langeh U, Kumar V, Ahuja P, Singh C, Singh A. An update on breast cancer chemotherapy-associated toxicity and their management approaches. Health Sci Re. 2023;9(100119)

LinkOut - more resources