Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul;20(7):629-646.
doi: 10.1080/17425255.2024.2378895. Epub 2024 Jul 22.

Screening tools to evaluate the neurotoxic potential of botanicals: building a strategy to assess safety

Jyotshna Kanungo  1 , Barbara C Sorkin  2 , Julie Krzykwa  3 , Constance A Mitchell  3 , Michelle Embry  3 , Peter Spencer  4 , G Jean Harry  5 , Jason Cannon  6 , Fang Liu  1 , Christopher A McPherson  5 , Stefan Gafner  7 , Remco H S Westerink  8
Affiliations
Review

Screening tools to evaluate the neurotoxic potential of botanicals: building a strategy to assess safety

Jyotshna Kanungo et al. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Areas covered: This paper outlines the selection of NAMs, including in vitro assays using primary rat cortical neurons, zebrafish embryos, and Caenorhabditis elegans. These assays aim to assess neurotoxic endpoints such as neuronal activity and behavioral responses. Microelectrode array recordings of rat cortical neurons provide insights into the impact of botanical extracts on neuronal function, while the zebrafish embryos and C. elegans assays evaluate neurobehavioral responses. The paper also provides an account of the selection of botanical case studies based on expert judgment and existing neuroactivity/toxicity information. The proposed battery of assays will be tested with these case studies to evaluate their utility for neurotoxicity screening.

Expert opinion: The complexity of botanicals necessitates the use of multiple NAMs for effective neurotoxicity screening. This paper discusses the evaluation of methodologies to develop a robust framework for evaluating botanical safety, including complex neuronal models and key neurodevelopmental process assays. It aims to establish a comprehensive screening framework.

Keywords: Botanical; NAM; UVCB; complex mixtures; in vitro; neurotoxicity; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests:

P Spencer - Consultant, Shenzhen Center for Disease Control & Prevention, Shenzhen, PRC. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Overview of the model system and experimental setup used to determine the suitability of these assays for botanicals. hpf: hours post-fertilization. Created with BioRender.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
MicroElectrode Array (MEA) recordings rely on 48-well plates that have a 4 × 4 electrode grid on the bottom of each well, on top of which neuronal cells can be cultured (top left). The spontaneous neuronal activity is recorded as local field potentials (bottom left). The neuroactive potential of botanical extracts can be assessed by comparing the neuronal activity before (baseline recording) and after exposure (right).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Schematic diagram showing the types of neurobehavioral assays performed in zebrafish larvae, such as larval photomotor response (LPR) assays conducted in light and dark phases, and larval startle response (LSR) assays.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Schematic diagram showing the types of neurobehavioral assays performed with C. elegans larvae, such as the reaction to adverse smell and body movement assays.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Smith T, Resetar H, Morton C. US Sales of Herbal Supplements Increase by 9.7% in 2021. The Journal of the American Botanical Council. 2022;42–69.
    1. Sorkin BC, Kuszak AJ, Bloss G, et al. Improving natural product research translation: From source to clinical trial. FASEB j. 2020;34:41–65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Houriet J, Vidar WS, Manwill PK, et al. How low can you go? Selecting intensity thresholds for untargeted metabolomics data preprocessing. Anal Chem. 2022;94:17964–17971. - PubMed
    1. Klaassen CD, Casarett LJ, Doull J, editors. Casarett and Doull’s toxicology: the basic science of poisons. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2013.
    1. Programme international sur la sécurité des substances chimiques, editor. Neurotoxicity risk assessment for human health: principles and approaches. Geneva: World health organization; 2001.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources