Mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty does not yield uniform outcomes across all coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) phenotypes
- PMID: 38984905
- DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12349
Mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty does not yield uniform outcomes across all coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) phenotypes
Abstract
Purpose: Patient dissatisfaction rates following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reported in the literature reach 20%. The optimal coronal alignment is still under debate. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare clinical outcomes in different coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) phenotypes undergoing mechanically aligned (MA) TKA. The hypothesis was that knees with preoperative varus arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) would achieve inferior clinical outcomes after surgery compared to other aHKA categories. Additionally, another objective was to assess CPAK phenotypes distribution in the study population.
Methods: A retrospective selection was made of 180 patients who underwent MA TKA from April 2021 to December 2022, with a 1-year follow-up. Coronal knee alignment was classified according to the CPAK classification. Clinical outcome evaluations were measured using the Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Short Form Survey 12 and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). Differences in clinical outcomes were considered statistically significant with a p value <0 .05.
Results: Patients with varus aHKA achieved significantly inferior outcomes at final follow-up compared to other aHKA categories in KSS pt. 1 (79.7 ± 17.2 vs. 85.6 ± 14.7; p = 0.028), OKS (39.2 ± 9.2 vs. 42.2 ± 7.2; p = 0.019) and FJS (75.4 ± 31.0 vs. 87.4 ± 22.9; p =0 .003). The most common aHKA category was the varus category (39%). The most common CPAK phenotypes were apex distal Types I (23.9%), II (22.8%) and III (13.3%).
Conclusion: MA TKA does not yield uniform outcomes across all CPAK phenotypes. Varus aHKA category shows significantly inferior results at final follow-up. The most prevalent CPAK categories are varus aHKA and apex distal JLO, with phenotypes I, II and III being the most common. However, their gender distribution varies significantly.
Level of evidence: Level IV.
Keywords: clinical outcomes; coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK); knee phenotypes; mechanical alignment (MA); total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
© 2024 European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy.
Similar articles
-
A systematic review of geographic differences in knee phenotypes based on the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification.Arthroplasty. 2025 May 8;7(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s42836-025-00311-4. Arthroplasty. 2025. PMID: 40336130 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pre- and postoperative Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee classification and its impact on clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty.Bone Joint J. 2024 Oct 1;106-B(10):1059-1066. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2023-1425.R1. Bone Joint J. 2024. PMID: 39348894
-
Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification.Bone Joint J. 2021 Feb;103-B(2):329-337. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-1050.R1. Bone Joint J. 2021. PMID: 33517740 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Restoration of anatomical knee phenotype is associated with improved postoperative clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty.Knee. 2025 Jun;54:291-300. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2025.02.028. Epub 2025 Mar 19. Knee. 2025. PMID: 40112496
-
Geographic Variation in Knee Phenotypes Based on the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee Classification: A Systematic Review.J Arthroplasty. 2023 Sep;38(9):1892-1899.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.047. Epub 2023 Mar 22. J Arthroplasty. 2023. PMID: 36963533
Cited by
-
Cartilage thickness can be accurately measured intraoperatively in total knee arthroplasty: A step further in calipered kinematic alignment.J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jan 26;12(1):e70155. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70155. eCollection 2025 Jan. J Exp Orthop. 2025. PMID: 39867675 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of geographic differences in knee phenotypes based on the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification.Arthroplasty. 2025 May 8;7(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s42836-025-00311-4. Arthroplasty. 2025. PMID: 40336130 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting a forgotten joint in patients one year after robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 May 31;26(1):536. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08789-4. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025. PMID: 40450270 Free PMC article.
-
Femoral components are positioned in greater external rotation using functional alignment in robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty compared to mechanical alignment.J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jul 21;12(3):e70362. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70362. eCollection 2025 Jul. J Exp Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40693218 Free PMC article.
-
Reproducibility of coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) using tibia-first restricted inverse kinematic alignment.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Apr 28;145(1):274. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05878-w. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025. PMID: 40293548 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Beckers, G., Meneghini, R.M., Hirschmann, M.T., Kostretzis, L., Kiss, M.‐O. & Vendittoli, P.‐A. (2024) Ten flaws of systematic mechanical alignment total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 39(3), 591–599. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.11.023
-
- Blakeney, W., Clément, J., Desmeules, F., Hagemeister, N., Rivière, C. & Vendittoli, P.‐A. (2019) Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty better reproduces normal gait than mechanical alignment. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 27(5), 1410–1417. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5174-1
-
- Bonner, T.J., Eardley, W.G.P., Patterson, P. & Gregg, P.J. (2011) The effect of post‐operative mechanical axis alignment on the survival of primary total knee replacements after a follow‐up of 15 years. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 93(9), 1217–1222. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B9.26573
-
- Bourne, R.B., Chesworth, B.M., Davis, A.M., Mahomed, N.N. & Charron, K.D.J. (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 468(1), 57–63. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9
-
- Calliess, T., Bauer, K., Stukenborg‐Colsman, C., Windhagen, H., Budde, S. & Ettinger, M. (2017) PSI kinematic versus non‐PSI mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 25(6), 1743–1748. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4136-8
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous