Current patterns of care and outcomes for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: An international multi-institutional collaborative
- PMID: 38985726
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35468
Current patterns of care and outcomes for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: An international multi-institutional collaborative
Abstract
Background: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a cutaneous sarcoma with an infiltrative growth pattern that makes it challenging to clear margins. High quality data regarding DFSP natural history, management, and outcomes are limited.
Methods: Data were retrospectively collected for adult DFSP patients who underwent resection at 10 institutions in eight countries. Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes were analyzed.
Results: Analysis included 347 patients consisting of young (median, 42 years), White (76.2%), males (54.2%) with truncal lesions (57.3%). The majority (76.8%) were symptomatic at presentation. Preoperative imaging was used in 55.9% of cases. Diagnosis was established with excisional biopsy in 50.9% versus incisional biopsy in 25.0% of cases. Despite planned margins of >1.0 cm in 67.4% of cases, only 69.0% of patients achieved R0 resection. Twenty-two percent of patients underwent at least one re-excision. R0 resection was achieved at a second procedure in 80.2% and a third procedure in 86.2%. Ultimately, R0 resection was feasible in 89.5% of all patients. Fibrosarcomatous transformation (FST) was observed in 12.6%. In total, 6.6% (N = 23) recurred (17 local, six distant). Of the six distant recurrences, 50.0% had FST. With a median follow-up of 47.0 months, disease-specific survival rate was 98.8%. In multivariable analysis, R0 margins at index resection were associated with wider circumferential margins and non-FST histology.
Conclusions: In this international, multicenter collaborative, DFSP practice patterns were heterogeneous but achieved favorable recurrence rates and survival. Multiple excisions to clear margins remain commonplace and can inform future efforts to optimize margin selection.
Keywords: R0 status; circumferential margins; dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans; resection.
© 2024 American Cancer Society.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Kreicher KL, Kurlander DE, Gittleman HR, Barnholtz‐Sloan JS, Bordeaux JS. Incidence and survival of primary dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans in the United States. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42(suppl 1):S24‐S31. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000000300
-
- Ratner D, Thomas CO, Johnson TM, et al. Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Results of a multiinstitutional series with an analysis of the extent of microscopic spread. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37(4):600‐613. doi:10.1016/s0190‐9622(97)70179‐8
-
- Vitiello GA, Lee AY, Berman RS. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: what is this? Surg Clin North Am. 2022;102(4):657‐665. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2022.05.004
-
- Bowne WB, Antonescu CR, Leung DH, et al. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a clinicopathologic analysis of patients treated and followed at a single institution. Cancer. 2000;88(12):2711‐2720. doi:10.1002/1097‐0142(20000615)88:12<2711::aid‐cncr9>3.0.co;2‐m
-
- Huis In't Veld EA, van Coevorden F, Grunhagen DJ, et al. Outcome after surgical treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: Is clinical follow‐up always indicated? Cancer. 2019;125(5):735‐741. doi:10.1002/cncr.31924
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous