Tailoring neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer: "The advent of a personalized approach"-The Breast-Gynecological and Immuno-Oncology International Cancer Conference (BGICC) consensus and recommendations
- PMID: 38985794
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35389
Tailoring neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer: "The advent of a personalized approach"-The Breast-Gynecological and Immuno-Oncology International Cancer Conference (BGICC) consensus and recommendations
Abstract
Background: The management of early breast cancer (BC) has witnessed an uprise in the use of neoadjuvant therapy and a remarkable reshaping of the systemic therapy postneoadjuvant treatment in the last few years, with the evolution of many controversial clinical situations that require consensus.
Methods: During the 14th Breast-Gynecological and Immuno-Oncology International Cancer Conference held in Egypt in 2022, a panel of 44 BC experts from 13 countries voted on statements concerning debatable challenges in the neo/adjuvant treatment setting. The recommendations were subsequently updated based on the most recent data emerging. A modified Delphi approach was used to develop this consensus. A consensus was achieved when ≥75% of voters selected an answer.
Results and conclusions: The consensus recommendations addressed different escalation and de-escalation strategies in the setting of neoadjuvant therapy for early BC. The recommendations recapitulate the available clinical evidence and expert opinion to individualize patient management and optimize therapy outcomes. Consensus was reached in 63% of the statements (52/83), and the rationale behind each statement was clarified.
Keywords: HER2‐positive breast cancer; adjuvant therapy; breast cancer; hormone receptor‐positive breast cancer; neoadjuvant therapy; triple‐negative breast cancer.
© 2024 American Cancer Society.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Long‐term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta‐analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(1):27‐39. doi:10.1016/S1470‐2045(17)30777‐5
-
- Conforti F, Pala L, Bagnardi V, et al. Surrogacy of pathologic complete response in trials of neoadjuvant therapy for early breast cancer: critical analysis of strengths, weaknesses, and misinterpretations. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(11):1668‐1675. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.3755
-
- Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, et al. Pathological complete response and long‐term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014;384(9938):164‐172. doi:10.1016/S0140‐6736(13)62422‐8
-
- I‐SPY2 Trial Consortium; Yee D, Demichele AM, et al. Association of event‐free and distant recurrence‐free survival with individual‐level pathologic complete response in neoadjuvant treatment of stages 2 and 3 breast cancer: three‐year follow‐up analysis for the I‐SPY2 adaptively randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(9):1355‐1362. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2535
-
- Nasa P, Jain R, Juneja D. Delphi methodology in healthcare research: how to decide its appropriateness. World J Methodol. 2021;11(4):116‐129. doi:10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous