The efficacy of an alcohol-based nasal antiseptic versus mupirocin or iodophor for preventing surgical site infections: A meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: Nasal decolonization of Staphylococcus aureus is a proven strategy to reduce surgical site infections (SSI). Recently updated guidelines expanded nasal decolonization beyond traditionally high-risk populations to include the option for alcohol-based antiseptics (ABAs). We assessed the efficacy of a novel ABA for reducing SSI compared to mupirocin and iodophor.

Methods: A literature search in Google Scholar, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases was completed of studies reporting SSI outcomes in hospitals using an ABA. Primary meta-analyses were conducted to analyze ABA clinical efficacy versus no intervention (7 studies); subanalyses compared the ABA to mupirocin (3 studies) or iodophor (2 studies).

Results: One hundred forty-seven nasal decolonization titles for SSI prevention were identified, of which 7 were accepted. In the studies selected, 16,212 patients were included: 7,983 (49.24%) control group, and 8,129 (50.14%) intervention group. Significant effect sizes (measured as odds ratios [ORs]) and z-scores were found in all 3 meta-analyses: (OR = 3.178, z = 4.743, P < .001) in ABA clinical efficacy, (OR = 4.110, z = 3.167, P < .01) in ABA versus mupirocin, and (OR = 3.043, z = 3.155, P < .01) in ABA versus iodophor. Funnel plots for each demonstrated a lack of bias.

Conclusions: Statistically significant positive effects were identified in all 3 meta-analyses. An ABA appears to be a viable alternative to mupirocin or iodophors to reduce SSIs.

Keywords: Meta-analysis; Nasal decolonization; Surgical site infections.