Efficacy and safety of eculizumab in Guillain-Barré syndrome: A phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial
- PMID: 38987228
- DOI: 10.1111/jns.12646
Efficacy and safety of eculizumab in Guillain-Barré syndrome: A phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial
Abstract
Background and aims: Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute, self-limited, immune-mediated peripheral neuropathy. Current treatments for GBS include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasma exchange, which may not sufficiently benefit severely affected patients. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of eculizumab add-on therapy to IVIg (standard-of-care treatment) in patients with severe GBS.
Methods: This phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (NCT04752566), enrolled Japanese adults (age ≥ 18 years) with severe GBS (Hughes functional grade [FG] score FG3 or FG4/FG5 within 2 weeks of onset of GBS). Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive intravenous infusion of eculizumab or placebo (once weekly for 4 weeks) with IVIg treatment with 20 weeks of follow-up. Primary efficacy endpoint was the time to first reach FG score ≤1 (able to run). Key secondary endpoints were proportion of participants achieving FG ≤1 at weeks 8 and 24 and FG improvement ≥3 at week 24. Pharmacodynamic analysis of serum free C5 concentration over time was performed. Safety was evaluated.
Results: The analysis included 57 participants (eculizumab, n = 37; placebo, n = 20). Primary endpoint was not achieved (hazard ratio, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.45-1.97; p = .89). Key secondary endpoints did not reach statistical significance. Serum C5 concentration was reduced by 99.99% at 1 h postdose and sustained to week 5 but returned to baseline at the end of follow-up period. No new safety signals for eculizumab were identified.
Interpretation: Although well tolerated, eculizumab treatment did not show significant effects on motor function recovery compared to placebo in patients with GBS.
Keywords: Guillain‐Barré syndrome; Japan; complement inhibition; eculizumab; safety.
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Peripheral Nerve Society.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Fokke C, van den Berg B, Drenthen J, Walgaard C, van Doorn PA, Jacobs BC. Diagnosis of Guillain‐Barre syndrome and validation of Brighton criteria. Brain. 2014;137(Pt 1):33‐43. doi:10.1093/brain/awt285
-
- Sejvar JJ, Kohl KS, Gidudu J, et al. Guillain‐Barre syndrome and fisher syndrome: case definitions and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine. 2011;29(3):599‐612. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.06.003
-
- Shahrizaila N, Lehmann HC, Kuwabara S. Guillain‐Barre syndrome. Lancet. 2021;397(10280):1214‐1228. doi:10.1016/S0140‐6736(21)00517‐1
-
- Ho TW, Mishu B, Li CY, et al. Guillain‐Barre syndrome in northern China. Relationship to campylobacter jejuni infection and anti‐glycolipid antibodies. Brain. 1995;118(Pt 3):597‐605. doi:10.1093/brain/118.3.597
-
- Hadden RD, Cornblath DR, Hughes RA, et al. Electrophysiological classification of Guillain‐Barre syndrome: clinical associations and outcome. Plasma exchange/Sandoglobulin Guillain‐Barre syndrome trial group. Ann Neurol. 1998;44(5):780‐788. doi:10.1002/ana.410440512
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
