Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 10;7(1):840.
doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06528-4.

Composite branched and linear F-actin maximize myosin-induced membrane shape changes in a biomimetic cell model

Affiliations

Composite branched and linear F-actin maximize myosin-induced membrane shape changes in a biomimetic cell model

Ryota Sakamoto et al. Commun Biol. .

Abstract

The architecture of the actin cortex determines the generation and transmission of stresses, during key events from cell division to migration. However, its impact on myosin-induced cell shape changes remains unclear. Here, we reconstitute a minimal model of the actomyosin cortex with branched or linear F-actin architecture within giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs, liposomes). Upon light activation of myosin, neither the branched nor linear F-actin architecture alone induces significant liposome shape changes. The branched F-actin network forms an integrated, membrane-bound "no-slip boundary" -like cortex that attenuates actomyosin contractility. By contrast, the linear F-actin network forms an unintegrated "slip boundary" -like cortex, where actin asters form without inducing membrane deformations. Notably, liposomes undergo significant deformations at an optimized balance of branched and linear F-actin networks. Our findings highlight the pivotal roles of branched F-actin in force transmission and linear F-actin in force generation to yield membrane shape changes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Light-activated contraction of the actomyosin networks within liposomes.
a Schematic of the light-activation of actomyosin contractility within a liposome encapsulating purified actin and myosin. b Timelapse images showing the mid-plane of the light-activated contracting actomyosin network within a liposome. The dashed line represents the position of the membrane. c The snapshot showing the fluorescently labeled lipid bilayer membrane in a mid-plane. d Actomyosin network contraction with 280 nM myosin. Black arrows are the total displacement, u, over 1 min, and vector magnitudes are normalized by its maximum. Colormap represents local strain fields. Mean compressive strain (e) and strain rate (f) over time (n = 12 liposomes and N = 2 independent experiments in 0 nM; n = 20 and N = 2 in 70 nM; n = 13 and N = 2 in 140 nM; n = 12 and N = 3 in 280 nM). Maximum strain (g) and maximum strain rate (h) extracted from (e) at 120 s and (f) (n = 12 liposomes and N = 2 independent experiments in 0 nM; n = 20 and N = 2 in 70 nM; n = 13 and N = 2 in 140 nM; n = 12 and N = 3 in 280 nM). Curves are mean ± SD. * and *** represent p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Assembly of distinct actin cortex architectures within liposomes.
a Schematic of the Arp2/3-nucleated branched F-actin cortex activated via His-VCA ([Arp2/3] = 25 nM). b A snapshot showing the surface of the Arp2/3 cortex liposome before 405 nm illumination. The nematic order parameter, S=cos2θ, is calculated from the director field (black dashes). c Snapshots showing the actin and membrane before and post 405 nm illumination. Membrane curvature is color-coded at 2 min. d Schematic of the mDia1-nucleated linear F-actin cortex ([mDia1] = 25 nM). e A snapshot showing the surface of the mDia1 cortex liposome and nematic order parameter. f Snapshots showing the actin and membrane before and post 405 nm illumination. Membrane curvature is color-coded at 2 min. g Schematic of the mixed F-actin architecture cortex at [mDia1]:[Arp2/3] = 1:1 ([mDia1] = 25 nM; [Arp2/3] = 25 nM). h A snapshot showing the surface of the mixed cortex liposome and nematic order parameter. i Snapshots showing the actin and membrane before and post 405 nm illumination. White arrows indicate local deformations. Membrane curvature is color-coded at 2 min. j Boxplot showing the mean order parameter (n = 8 liposomes and N = 5 independent experiments in Arp2/3; n = 9 and N = 3 in mDia1; n = 11 and N = 2 in Mixed). Membrane strain (k) and actin polarity (l) over time (n = 33 and N = 6 in Arp2/3; n = 24 and N = 5 in mDia1; n = 26 and N = 2 in Mixed). Maximum membrane strain (m) and maximum actin polarity (n) extracted from (k) and (l) (n = 33 and N = 6 in Arp2/3; n = 24 and N = 5 in mDia1; n = 26 and N = 2 in Mixed). Curves are mean ± SD. *, **, and *** represents p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively. n.s. not significant. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Contour shape analysis on deformed membranes.
a Snapshots showing the definition of radial membrane position R(θ, t) and deformation amplitude u(θ, t). b Time evolution of the deformation amplitude in mixed architecture cortex. Time is color-coded. The right snapshots show the mid-plane image of the membrane at 0 min and 2 min. c Time evolution of the deformation amplitude in Arp2/3-nucleated cortex. d Time evolution of the deformation amplitude in mDia1-nucleated cortex. e Boxplot showing maximum radial deformation (n = 24 liposomes and N = 2 independent experiments in Arp2/3; n = 31 and N = 2 in mDia1; n = 31 and N = 3 in Mixed). f Power spectrum of membrane deformation with different F-actin cortex architecture. The power spectrum is averaged over 20 frames for each liposome, which is averaged for all liposomes. Curves are mean ± SEM. Dotted lines are the eye guide for q−4 and q−2 (n = 14 and N = 2 in Arp2/3; n = 13 and N = 2 in mDia1; n = 15 and N = 2 in Mixed). g Boxplot showing scaling exponent α. Scaling exponent is extracted by fitting the power spectrum by a function qa for all q (n = 20 and N = 2 in Arp2/3; n = 26 and N = 2 in mDia1; n = 30 and N = 3 in Mixed). h Autocorrelation of the deformation amplitude. θc is the deformation size calculated at the smallest θ at which autocorrelation becomes 0. The autocorrelation at the time frame t' was shown at which θc takes the smallest value. Curves are mean ± SD (n = 14 and N = 2 in Arp2/3; n = 13 and N = 2 in mDia1; n = 15 and N = 2 in Mixed). i Boxplot showing the deformation size (n = 33 and N = 3 in Arp2/3; n = 32 and N = 3 in mDia1; n = 49 and N = 3 in Mixed). *, **, and *** represent p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively. n.s. not significant. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. A fine-tuning of the mixed F-actin architecture facilitates membrane deformation.
a Schematic of the mixed F-actin cortex with increasing mDia1 concentration. b Snapshots of the surface of the liposome and the mid-plane of the actin cortex at post-illumination (after 2 min) for different mDia1 to Arp2/3 ratio. Boxplots showing maximum membrane strain (c) and maximum actin polarity (d) at varied mDia1 to Arp2/3 ratio (n = 33 liposomes and N = 2 independent experiments in [mDia1]/[Arp2/3] = 0; n = 28 and N = 2 in 1/25; n = 26 and N = 2 in 1/5; n = 41 and N = 2 in 1/2; n = 32 and N = 3 in 1; n = 23 and N = 2 in 5; n = 36 and N = 2 in 25). e Schematic of the mDia1-nucleated linear F-actin cortex with increasing mDia1 concentration. f Snapshots of the surface of the liposome and the mid-plane of the actin cortex at post-illumination (after 2 min) for different mDia1 concentrations. Maximum membrane strain (g) and maximum actin polarity (h) at varied mDia1 concentration (n = 31 and N = 2 in [mDia1] = 25 nM; n = 36 and N = 2 in 125 nM; n = 49 and N = 2 in 625 nM). i Schematic of the Arp2/3-nucleated branched F-actin cortex at three times higher Arp2/3 concentration than the control condition in (a) with increasing mDia1 concentration. j Snapshots of the surface of the liposome and the mid-plane of the actin cortex at post-illumination (after 2 min) for different mDia1 concentrations. Maximum membrane strain (k) and maximum actin polarity (l) at varied mDia1 concentration (n = 31 and N = 3 in [mDia1] = 0 nM; n = 22 and N = 2 in 25 nM; n = 29 and N = 3 in 125 nM). *, **, *** represent p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively. n.s. not significant. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. F-actin architecture determines force generation, transmission, and membrane deformations.
a A phase diagram of the maximum membrane strain and the maximum actin polarity for different F-actin cortex architectures. The data points with error bars represent mean ± SD (In mixed, n = 33 liposomes and N = 2 independent experiments in [mDia1]/[Arp2/3] = 0; n = 28 and N = 2 in 1/25; n = 26 and N = 2 in 1/5; n = 41 and N = 2 in 1/2; n = 32 and N = 3 in 1; n = 23 and N = 2 in 5; n = 36 and N = 2 in 25. In mDia1 only, n = 31 and N = 2 in [mDia1]=25 nM; n = 36 and N = 2 in 125 nM; n = 49 and N = 2 in 625 nM. In 3 × [Arp2/3], n = 31 and N = 3 in [mDia1]=0 nM; n = 22 and N = 2 in 25 nM; n = 29 and N = 3 in 125 nM). b Schematic represents the F-actin architectural control of membrane deformations shown in (a). c Schematic summarizing the F-actin architectural control of force generation, transmission, and membrane deformations. The Arp2/3-nucleated cortex branches the F-actin network and forms membrane-to-cortex links, which provide a no-slip boundary-like condition. However, the contractility is attenuated within the highly branched actin gel. In contrast, the mDia1-nucleated cortex allows force generation within the network, while the unbranched nature of the network results in the slip boundary-like condition without membrane deformation. When both the Arp2/3-nucleated branch and mDia1-nucleated linear filaments coexist, contractility within the F-actin network is transmitted to the adjacent membrane, inducing a significant membrane deformation.

References

    1. Pollard TD. Actin and actin-binding proteins. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2016;8:a018226. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018226. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salbreux G, Charras G, Paluch E. Actin cortex mechanics and cellular morphogenesis. Trends Cell Biol. 2012;22:536–545. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.07.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murrell M, Oakes PW, Lenz M, Gardel ML. Forcing cells into shape: the mechanics of actomyosin contractility. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015;16:486–498. doi: 10.1038/nrm4012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Green RA, Paluch E, Oegema K. Cytokinesis in animal cells. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2012;28:29–58. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101011-155718. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Charras GT, Coughlin M, Mitchison TJ, Mahadevan L. Life and times of a cellular bleb. Biophys. J. 2008;94:1836–1853. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.113605. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources