Features associated with clinically actionable hyperechoic hepatic lesions to determine the need for follow-up
- PMID: 38987400
- DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04248-1
Features associated with clinically actionable hyperechoic hepatic lesions to determine the need for follow-up
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the rate of hyperechoic liver lesions that are clinically actionable and evaluate imaging and clinical factors associated with these to determine the need for follow-up.
Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 228 hyperechoic hepatic lesions on ultrasound in 228 patients. Reference standards included either dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (n = 130) or CT (n = 46), follow-up ultrasound performed at least 2 years from baseline (n = 50), or histopathology (n = 2). Three radiologists independently assessed imaging features including lesion orientation, degree of hyper-echogenicity, lesion heterogeneity, and background liver echotexture. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to determine features associated with an actionable hyperechoic lesion.
Results: Of the 228 hyperechoic lesions, 14 (6.1%) lesions were clinically actionable (or requiring follow-up), and 214 (93.9%) were clinically insignificant. Features that differed between patients with clinically insignificant vs. actionable lesions included: age (52.9 ± 15.1 vs. 63.9 ± 15.8 years, p = 0.004), male sex (43.9% vs 71.4%, p = 0.045), history of cirrhosis (6.5% vs 50%, p < 0.001), lesion size (1.9 ± 1.4 cm vs. 3.5 ± 2.8 cm, p = 0.003), heterogeneous lesion echogenicity (16.4% vs. 50%, p = 0.006), and cirrhotic/coarsened background liver (7.5% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.005). Stepwise logistic regression and multivariable analysis identified age, presence of cirrhosis, and lesion size as features most predictive of an actionable lesion (OR 1.04, 24.3, 1.77 respectively). Reader agreement for imaging features was fair to moderate (k = 0.29-0.53). 100%(168/168) of hyperechoic liver lesions measuring ≤ 3 cm in patients without a history of malignancy or underlying liver disease were clinically insignificant.
Conclusion: Our study findings support the overall favorable diagnoses of hyperechoic liver lesions ≤ 3 cm in patients without underlying risk factors.
Keywords: Hemangioma; Hyperechoic lesion; Ultrasound.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Do Incidental Hyperechoic Renal Lesions Measuring Up to 1 cm Warrant Further Imaging? Outcomes of 161 Lesions.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Aug;209(2):346-350. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17490. Epub 2017 Jun 13. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017. PMID: 28609114
-
Hyperechoic and hypoechoic hepatic hemangiomas smaller than 3 cm seldom coexist.Ultrasound Q. 2014 Dec;30(4):291-4. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000058. Ultrasound Q. 2014. PMID: 25415867
-
Clinical Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Hyperechoic Liver Lesions.Med Sci Monit. 2015 Sep 22;21:2845-50. doi: 10.12659/MSM.894115. Med Sci Monit. 2015. PMID: 26394170 Free PMC article.
-
Typical and atypical benign liver lesions: A review.Clin Imaging. 2017 Jul-Aug;44:79-91. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 4. Clin Imaging. 2017. PMID: 28486156 Review.
-
[Contrast enhanced ultrasound of the liver--state of the art].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007 Jun 1;132(22):1225-31. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-979403. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007. PMID: 17520509 Review. German.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical