Free-Docking and Template-Based Docking: Physics Versus Knowledge-Based Docking
- PMID: 38987462
- DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3985-6_3
Free-Docking and Template-Based Docking: Physics Versus Knowledge-Based Docking
Abstract
Docking methods can be used to predict the orientations of two or more molecules with respect of each other using a plethora of various algorithms, which can be based on the physics of interactions or can use information from databases and templates. The usability of these approaches depends on the type and size of the molecules, whose relative orientation will be estimated. The two most important limitations are (i) the computational cost of the prediction and (ii) the availability of the structural information for similar complexes. In general, if there is enough information about similar systems, knowledge-based and template-based methods can significantly reduce the computational cost while providing high accuracy of the prediction. However, if the information about the system topology and interactions between its partners is scarce, physics-based methods are more reliable or even the only choice. In this chapter, knowledge-, template-, and physics-based methods will be compared and briefly discussed providing examples of their usability with a special emphasis on physics-based protein-protein, protein-peptide, and protein-fullerene docking in the UNRES coarse-grained model.
Keywords: Carbon nanoparticles; Force fields; Fullerenes; Genetic algorithms; Knowledge-based docking methods; Molecular dynamics; Physics-based docking methods; Proteins and peptides; Template-based docking methods; UNRES.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Addressing recent docking challenges: A hybrid strategy to integrate template-based and free protein-protein docking.Proteins. 2017 Mar;85(3):497-512. doi: 10.1002/prot.25234. Epub 2017 Jan 24. Proteins. 2017. PMID: 28026062
-
What method to use for protein-protein docking?Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2019 Apr;55:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2018.12.010. Epub 2019 Feb 1. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2019. PMID: 30711743 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Protein-protein and peptide-protein docking and refinement using ATTRACT in CAPRI.Proteins. 2017 Mar;85(3):391-398. doi: 10.1002/prot.25196. Epub 2016 Nov 24. Proteins. 2017. PMID: 27785830
-
ComDock: A novel approach for protein-protein docking with an efficient fusing strategy.Comput Biol Med. 2023 Dec;167:107660. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107660. Epub 2023 Nov 2. Comput Biol Med. 2023. PMID: 37944303
-
Computational Methods for the Elucidation of Protein Structure and Interactions.Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2305:23-52. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1406-8_2. Methods Mol Biol. 2021. PMID: 33950383 Review.
Cited by
-
Investigations on genomic, topological and structural properties of diguanylate cyclases involved in Vibrio cholerae biofilm signalling using in silico techniques: Promising drug targets in combating cholera.Curr Res Struct Biol. 2025 Apr 9;9:100166. doi: 10.1016/j.crstbi.2025.100166. eCollection 2025 Jun. Curr Res Struct Biol. 2025. PMID: 40330072 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cancela F, Rendon-Marin S, Quintero-Gil C et al (2021) Modelling of Hepatitis E virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase genotype 3 from a chronic patient and interaction analysis by molecular docking with Ribavirin. J Biomol Struct Dyn:1–17
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources